Washington, D.C. – In a decisive step to restore accuracy and transparency to America’s economic reporting, President Donald Trump has nominated E.J. Antoni, a sharp-eyed economist from the Heritage Foundation, to helm the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). This follows Trump’s prompt removal of the previous commissioner, Erika McEntarfer, after a July jobs report riddled with downward revisions that critics argue inflated perceptions of weakness in an otherwise resilient economy. Antoni, a staunch advocate for data integrity and a vocal supporter of Trump’s pro-growth policies, is set to inject much-needed reform into an agency plagued by methodological flaws and declining survey response rates.
The nomination has drawn predictable fire from liberal economists and media outlets, who decry Antoni’s conservative credentials as a threat to “nonpartisanship.” But from a right-leaning perspective, this is exactly the shake-up the BLS needs. For years, conservatives have highlighted inconsistencies in BLS data that seem to downplay economic strengths under Republican leadership while overstating them during Democratic administrations. Antoni’s track record of exposing these issues positions him as the ideal leader to rebuild trust—not through status quo preservation, but through bold improvements that align statistics with real-world realities.
Profiling E.J. Antoni: A Conservative Crusader for Economic Truth
E.J. Antoni, Ph.D., currently serves as Chief Economist and Richard Aster Fellow at The Heritage Foundation’s Grover M. Hermann Center for the Federal Budget. He holds master’s and doctoral degrees in economics from Northern Illinois University, with a focus on labor economics, money and banking, and fiscal policy. Before Heritage, Antoni was an economist at the Texas Public Policy Foundation and is now a senior fellow at the Committee to Unleash Prosperity, co-founded by Trump advisor Stephen Moore.
Antoni’s expertise shines in his frequent congressional testimonies on economic issues and his media appearances on outlets like Fox Business, where he dissects BLS reports with precision. He has critiqued BLS methodologies, pointing to post-pandemic drops in survey response rates that lead to unreliable preliminary estimates and massive revisions. In a recent Fox Business interview, Antoni suggested pausing monthly jobs reports until accuracy improves, favoring quarterly releases for better data quality—a proposal that, while controversial, addresses genuine flaws like the 258,000 downward revision in the July report.
Trump praised Antoni on Truth Social as a “Highly Respected Economist” who will deliver “HONEST and ACCURATE” numbers, echoing Antoni’s pre-nomination commitment to “more accurate data, as timely as possible.” Antoni’s alignment with Trump’s narrative is clear: he has championed the economic booms from tax cuts and deregulation, while exposing Biden-era distortions like overstated job growth. Supporters like Stephen Moore call him a “very good statistician and a sound, solid economist” unlikely to face confirmation hurdles.
On X, conservative voices rally: “Trump’s nominee for BLS commissioner… has demonstrated no commitment to truth,” quipped one critic, but right-leaning users counter, “Finally, someone to fix the rigged system.”
Departing from the Establishment: Antoni Compared to Past Commissioners
BLS commissioners have traditionally been academic insiders with extensive statistical backgrounds but often accused by conservatives of liberal biases. Erica Groshen (Obama-era) and Katharine Abraham (Clinton-era) exemplified this, with Ph.D.s from elite institutions and Fed ties, prioritizing survey methodologies over real-world applicability. Even Trump’s first-term pick, William Beach, emphasized “nonpartisanship,” but critics argue this led to unchecked flaws.
Antoni breaks this mold: his Ph.D. is from a practical program, and his experience is in policy think tanks, not academia. Detractors like Jason Furman call him “completely unqualified” and an “extreme partisan,” while Joey Politano notes his five years post-Ph.D. and think-tank focus. Justin Wolfers labels him a “disastrously terrible” Trumper with “misrepresentations.” But this reeks of elitism—Antoni’s “lack of research record” ignores his real-world impact, like testifying on fiscal issues and critiquing BLS’s “phony baloney” health insurance data.
From the right, Antoni represents a necessary outsider to challenge entrenched biases, much like Trump’s disruption of Washington norms.
Market Ramifications: Short-Term Jitters, Long-Term Gains?
The BLS’s data on unemployment, CPI, and productivity drives Fed decisions, corporate strategies, and investor moves. Trump’s firing of McEntarfer sparked initial market dips, with the Dow falling 0.5% amid fears of politicization. Bond yields edged up as uncertainty grew over inflation data reliability. Critics warn of eroded trust leading to volatility, but conservatives see opportunity: accurate reforms could reveal Trump’s economic strengths, boosting confidence.
Historical parallels, like Argentina’s data manipulation, show risks, but Antoni’s push for transparency—more website info, methodology reviews—could stabilize markets. If revisions persist (e.g., post-COVID response drops), quarterly reports might prevent panics. Ultimately, a reformed BLS could highlight successes like low minority unemployment, encouraging investment in manufacturing amid tariffs.
The Conservative Case: Antoni as America’s Data Watchdog
In a time of institutional distrust, nominating a “partisan” like Antoni isn’t reckless—it’s restorative. The BLS has long been a liberal stronghold, producing data that justifies big-government narratives while ignoring issues like immigration’s wage effects. Antoni’s Heritage role and Project 2025 contributions ensure focus on working Americans, not elites.
Criticisms from Furman and Wolfers? Partisan sniping from Obama alums. Even Beach’s caution reflects establishment fear of change. Antoni’s “chainsaw” quip to BLS inefficiencies is rhetoric for reform, not destruction. With Senate confirmation ahead, this is a win for truth over technocracy.



