Author: kenzie Lauren

  • Today’ Host Savannah Guthrie Issues Public Plea in Mother’s Disappearance Case

    Today’ Host Savannah Guthrie Issues Public Plea in Mother’s Disappearance Case

    “Today” co-anchor Savannah Guthrie directly addressed her mother’s apparent kidnapper in a recorded video message, asking for proof of the 84-year-old’s well-being and expressing a willingness to speak.

    Nancy Guthrie, 84, was last seen about 9:45 p.m. Saturday, when her family dropped her off at her Tucson home after dinner.

    Her disappearance has prompted a sprawling investigation by local law enforcement and federal agents. Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos has said he believes Nancy was abducted, but investigators have yet to identify a person of interest or suspect.

    In an emotional video message Wednesday, Guthrie said she and her siblings, Annie and Camron, had heard reports about a ransom letter through the media, but did not offer any information about its authenticity. On Tuesday, some outlets reported receiving unverified ransom notes relating to Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance. Investigators have said they are aware of the reports but haven’t publicly verified their authenticity.

    “We are ready to talk,” Guthrie said, directly addressing her mother’s apparent abductor, while adding that her family needed an assurance of Nancy’s well-being. “We need to know, without a doubt, that she is alive and that you have her.”

    Guthrie said her mother was in fragile health, living in constant pain and requiring medicine — that she currently is without — to survive.

    She then addressed her mother: “Everyone is looking for you, Mommy, everywhere,” Guthrie said. “We will not rest, your children will not rest, until we are together again.”

    On Wednesday, the sheriff’s office said about one hundred detectives are working on the case, with help from the FBI.

    “Detectives believe Mrs. Guthrie was taken against her will, possibly during the overnight hours,” the sheriff’s office said in a statement Wednesday, without providing any information about possible injuries. It added that investigators have collected and sent any DNA evidence found at the scene for testing. While some of the results have been received, nothing so far points to a person of interest or suspect, the update said.

    “At this point, there is no credible information indicating this was a targeted incident,” the office said in a statement.

    Investigators have scheduled a media briefing for Thursday morning.

  • Trump Plans to Install Christopher Columbus Statue Outside the White House

    Trump Plans to Install Christopher Columbus Statue Outside the White House

    In a bold move that underscores President Donald Trump’s commitment to honoring America’s European roots and celebrating the enduring legacy of exploration and discovery, the White House is preparing to install a statue of Christopher Columbus on its historic grounds. This initiative, revealed by sources close to the administration, represents a significant step in Trump’s ongoing efforts to preserve and promote the contributions of European heritage to the nation’s founding narrative, pushing back against what many conservatives view as an assault on traditional American history by progressive activists.

    According to three individuals with direct knowledge of the plans—who spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of ongoing discussions—the statue will be positioned on the south side of the White House grounds, near E Street and just north of the Ellipse. While details could still evolve, this location would place the monument in a prominent spot, visible to visitors and symbolizing a reclamation of historical figures long revered for their role in bridging the Old World and the New.

    The statue itself carries a story of resilience and restoration that mirrors the administration’s broader theme of defending American icons from “left-wing arsonists,” as Trump has frequently described those who toppled monuments during the 2020 racial unrest. Originally unveiled in Baltimore by President Ronald Reagan in 1984, the sculpture was vandalized and dumped into the city’s harbor amid nationwide protests. But thanks to the determination of Italian-American businessmen, politicians, and local artisans, the remnants were recovered and meticulously rebuilt with support from charitable donations and federal grants.

    Bill Martin, a prominent Italian-American entrepreneur who spearheaded the recovery effort, confirmed to reporters that the restored statue is currently stored in a warehouse on Maryland’s Eastern Shore and is slated for transfer to the White House in the coming weeks. “This isn’t just about Columbus ‘discovering America’—though his voyage in 1492 opened the doors to the Western Hemisphere and paved the way for the freedoms we enjoy today,” Martin said in an interview. “It’s about the Italian immigrants who came to this country, built communities from nothing, and saw Columbus as a symbol of courage and perseverance. President Trump’s decision to honor him here, at the heart of our government, is a victory for heritage and a rebuke to the mob mentality that tried to erase him.”

    President Donald Trump in October signed a proclamation to celebrate Columbus Day. (Sarah L. Voisin/The Washington Post)
    President Donald Trump in October signed a proclamation to celebrate Columbus Day. (Sarah L. Voisin/The Washington Post)

    The White House, while declining to comment on specific installation timelines, issued a strong endorsement of the explorer through spokesman Davis Ingle. “In this White House, Christopher Columbus is a hero,” Ingle stated. “And he will continue to be honored as such by President Trump. His daring expeditions embodied the American spirit of adventure and innovation, forging ties between Europe and the Americas that shaped the modern world.”

    Trump’s admiration for Columbus is no secret. During his first term, he fiercely condemned the destruction of Columbus statues across the country, framing it as part of a broader “cancel culture” attack on Western civilization. In 2021, he issued an executive order establishing a proposed National Garden of American Heroes, which prominently featured Columbus alongside other trailblazers who exemplified “daring and defiance, excellence and adventure, courage and confidence, loyalty and love.” This garden, though still in planning stages, aimed to counter what Trump called the “corrosive ideology” infiltrating schools and institutions, which he argues downplays the heroic aspects of European exploration in favor of a one-sided focus on colonialism.

    Critics on the left have long portrayed Columbus as a controversial figure, pointing to the exploitation and hardships faced by indigenous populations following his arrival. Some states have even replaced Columbus Day with Indigenous Peoples’ Day, a shift that gained federal recognition under President Joe Biden in 2021. But proponents of Columbus, including many in the Italian-American community, argue that such revisions overlook the explorer’s groundbreaking achievements: navigating uncharted waters under the Spanish crown, establishing transatlantic trade routes, and igniting an era of global exchange that brought advancements in science, culture, and commerce to both continents.

    “Columbus wasn’t perfect—no historical figure is—but his voyages represented the pinnacle of European ingenuity and bravery,” said Dr. Maria Esposito, a historian at the Heritage Foundation specializing in European-American relations. “By installing this statue, President Trump is reminding us that America’s story is intertwined with Europe’s, and we should celebrate that heritage rather than apologize for it. It’s a stand against the radical left’s attempts to rewrite history and divide us along ethnic lines.”

    Trump’s 2024 campaign amplified this message, with the president pledging to restore national pride in Columbus Day. In October 2025, he signed a presidential proclamation declaring Columbus “the original American hero” and reaffirming the federal holiday. “We’re back, Italians. Okay? We love the Italians,” Trump declared at the signing ceremony, drawing cheers from Italian-American supporters. He later tied the move to electoral politics, urging voters to “remember when you go to the voting booths, I reinstated Columbus Day.” This appeal resonates in key swing states with large Italian-American populations, such as Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Michigan, where cultural pride could influence midterm turnout.

    Nino Mangione, a Republican delegate in the Maryland House of Delegates who assisted in the statue’s restoration, hailed the White House plan as a triumph for democratic values. “It is such an honor for the Italian American community,” Mangione wrote in an email to this reporter. “This proves that gangs, thugs, and people of that ilk don’t control things by mob rule. In America, the people rule and our voices are heard.” Mangione estimated that the restoration cost over $100,000, funded through grassroots efforts that galvanized the community.

    In a 1984 file photo, President Ronald Reagan addresses a ceremony in Baltimore to unveil a statue of Christopher Columbus. Pieces of the Christopher Columbus statue were retrieved from the Inner Harbor in July 2020 after protesters pulled it down and threw it in the water. (Lana Harris/AP)
    In a 1984 file photo, President Ronald Reagan addresses a ceremony in Baltimore to unveil a statue of Christopher Columbus. Pieces of the Christopher Columbus statue were retrieved from the Inner Harbor in July 2020 after protesters pulled it down and threw it in the water. (Lana Harris/AP)

    The Columbus statue’s impending arrival follows other Trump administration actions to restore contested monuments, including the October 2025 reinstallation of a statue of Confederate general Albert Pike in a federal park east of the White House. Pike’s memorial, toppled in 2020, was rebuilt and repositioned as part of Trump’s push to preserve all facets of American history, even those deemed divisive by progressives. “History isn’t always comfortable, but erasing it doesn’t make us better—it makes us ignorant,” Trump said at the Pike unveiling, a sentiment echoed by supporters who see these efforts as essential to maintaining a balanced national narrative.

    However, not all reactions have been positive. Historic preservation groups have raised concerns about bypassing federal review processes for alterations to the

    White House grounds, which are protected under the National Historic Preservation Act. Trump’s previous changes—such as demolishing the East Wing annex for a $400 million ballroom, repaving the Rose Garden for a new patio, and redesigning interior spaces like the Lincoln Bathroom—have drawn lawsuits from organizations arguing that such modifications undermine the site’s integrity.

    Despite these criticisms, the administration presses forward, viewing the Columbus statue as a capstone to Trump’s vision of a White House that reflects unapologetic patriotism and cultural reverence. For Italian-Americans like Martin and Mangione, it’s more than bronze and marble; it’s a symbol of immigrant success stories that built America. As Trump often reminds his base, “We’re making America proud again—starting right here at home.”

    This development comes at a time when debates over historical figures continue to polarize the nation, but for those who value European heritage and the spirit of discovery, the statue’s installation is a welcome affirmation. As one anonymous source put it, “Columbus opened the door to the New World. Now, Trump is opening the door to remembering why that matters.”

  • Trump revels in Davos about boosting wealth for the Elite & CEOs

    Trump revels in Davos about boosting wealth for the Elite & CEOs

    In the snow-capped peaks of Davos, Switzerland, where the world’s power brokers convene each year under the banner of the World Economic Forum (WEF), President Donald Trump took center stage this week, delivering a message that resonated more with champagne toasts than kitchen-table concerns. Surrounded by CEOs from titans like Visa, Cisco, Salesforce, JPMorgan Chase, and Amazon, Trump didn’t hold back in celebrating how his policies have supercharged the fortunes of the ultra-wealthy.

    “You’ve doubled your net worth since I’ve been president, right?” he quipped to one executive, drawing laughs from the room. “Yeah, even more than that,” came the reply, according to accounts of the reception. It’s a scene that underscores a growing divide in America—one where the elite thrive while everyday folks, especially the young trying to build their futures, feel left in the dust.

    This year’s WEF, held from January 19-23, 2026, has been a whirlwind of high-stakes discussions on global trade, AI-driven growth, and yes, the perennial push for “sustainable” initiatives that often translate to burdensome regulations on ordinary people. Trump, leading the largest U.S. delegation ever, including half a dozen Cabinet secretaries, used the platform to tout America’s economic resurgence under his watch. He highlighted record-breaking investment commitments topping $18 trillion—potentially nearing $20 trillion once finalized—contrasting sharply with the Biden era’s meager $1 trillion over four years. “When America booms, the entire world booms,” Trump declared in his main address, emphasizing U.S. exceptionalism and urging other nations to ditch outdated playbooks.

    But amid the backslapping and billion-dollar deal announcements, Trump’s remarks at a private reception for global business leaders struck a particularly jarring note. “I don’t even ask anybody how you’re doing now. It’s like everybody is making so much money,” he said, reveling in the stock market highs and corporate profits that have ballooned under his pro-business agenda. He even reminisced about his first term’s tax cuts, dubbing them the “Big Beautiful Bill,” and joked about a wealthy friend who bought an airplane just for the deduction—never even using it. “That’s what made my first term so successful,” Trump added with a grin.

    From a right-of-center perspective, there’s no denying Trump’s economic playbook has delivered wins: tariffs acting as a “cash machine,” ending endless wars, and fostering a business environment where innovation flourishes without the heavy hand of government overreach. His emphasis on American jobs “through the roof” and making the U.S. the “safest and hottest investment destination on earth” is music to the ears of those weary of globalist entanglements. Yet, this Davos display feels a tad tone-deaf, especially when juxtaposed against the realities facing young Americans. Polls show seven in ten view the economy as “poor,” with inflation lingering and housing costs skyrocketing. The so-called “K-shaped” recovery—where the top surges ahead while the bottom stagnates—has only widened the gap, as Oxfam’s 2026 inequality report starkly illustrates: billionaire wealth grew 16% last year, three times the five-year average, ballooning to over $18 trillion.

    This isn’t just about envy; it’s about fairness. Trump’s Cabinet, peppered with billionaires, has occasionally let slip comments that highlight this disconnect. Take Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s recent defense of a policy to bar institutional investors from snapping up single-family homes—a move aimed at easing housing pressures blamed on big firms driving up prices. Bessent assured that “mom and pop” investors wouldn’t be affected, defining them as retirees owning “five, 10, 12 homes.” California Governor Gavin Newsom, also at Davos, pounced on the clip, calling Bessent “smug” and out of touch. Bessent fired back, quipping that Newsom “may be the only Californian who knows less about economics than Kamala Harris.” Fair shot, perhaps, but it doesn’t change the fact that for young people scraping by on entry-level wages, owning even one home feels like a pipe dream, let alone a dozen.

    And let’s not forget the broader WEF backdrop. This elite gathering, often criticized as a schmoozefest for the jet-set crowd, pushes agendas like aggressive climate action and environmental mandates that hit the working class hardest. Trump’s appearance here draws irony, given MAGA influencer Katie Miller’s jab at Newsom for attending: “Nothing quite says America First like commiserating with the crowd of the World’s Elites.” Miller, married to White House adviser Stephen Miller—architect of tough immigration policies that prioritize American workers—had a point. Newsom used his time to rally elites against Trump, urging them to “stand up more strongly” to his agenda. But Trump flipped the script, rubbing elbows with the rich while unapologetically boasting about enriching them further.

    Here’s where a healthy dose of anti-elitism comes in: Why revel in doubling billionaires’ net worths when young Americans are burdened by student debt, stagnant wages, and policies that favor open borders over homegrown talent? Trump’s anti-immigration stance, including mass deportations defended at the reception, is a step in the right direction—protecting jobs for the next generation rather than flooding the market with cheap labor. Remigration schemes, often floated by globalists as a “humane” way to shuffle populations, ignore the chaos they unleash on communities and economies. We’re anti-remigration here because it disrupts the lives of young people trying to establish roots, all while elites pontificate from their chalets.

    President Donald Trump addresses the audience during the Annual Meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Wednesday. © Evan Vucci/AP
    President Donald Trump addresses the audience during the Annual Meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Wednesday. © Evan Vucci/AP

    Moreover, the WEF’s obsession with climate alarmism and environmentalism reeks of hypocrisy. These so-called “sustainable” policies—think carbon taxes and green mandates—drive up energy costs, making life unaffordable for the average family, especially young starters. Trump’s skepticism toward such initiatives is spot-on; they’ve done little but enrich green-tech billionaires while saddling the rest with higher bills. As he noted in Davos, his administration’s focus on deregulation has unleashed genius in the private sector, from AI to manufacturing, without the phony virtue-signaling of climate crusades.

    Other administration gaffes haven’t helped the optics. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins suggested Americans could afford a nutritious $3 meal including “a piece of broccoli,” echoing Trump’s earlier advice to buy fewer dolls and pencils amid economic woes. These remarks, while perhaps well-intentioned, play into Democrats’ hands as the 2026 midterms loom, painting Republicans as aloof to pocketbook pains.

    Yet, credit where due: Trump’s Davos push for housing affordability, including incentives for billionaires to invest in real solutions, shows promise. He celebrated massive pledges, like a $10 billion plant investment from a foreign tycoon, as proof of America’s allure. And his shoutouts to tech moguls like Nvidia’s Jensen Huang—whose net worth hit $162 billion—highlight how pro-innovation policies can create opportunities, even if the gains skew upward.

    In the end, Trump’s Davos revelry is a double-edged sword. It showcases a booming economy that’s the envy of the world, but it also amplifies the elite echo chamber at a time when young people need policies that lift them up, not lectures from the top. As inequality surges and WEF elites pat themselves on the back, a right-center view demands more focus on Main Street—tighter borders, fewer green handouts, and real relief for the rising generation. If Trump can pivot from billionaire backslaps to youth empowerment, he’ll solidify his legacy. Otherwise, Democrats like Newsom will keep exploiting the divide.

  • Indian Students Win $200K Over ‘Pungent’ Food Complaint at US University

    Indian Students Win $200K Over ‘Pungent’ Food Complaint at US University

    In a case that has sparked widespread discussion in Indian diaspora communities and beyond, two Indian doctoral students at the University of Colorado Boulder have received a $200,000 settlement from the university following a federal civil rights lawsuit. The dispute originated from a 2023 complaint about the smell of homemade Indian food—specifically palak paneer—being heated in a departmental microwave, which the students claim spiraled into broader discrimination, retaliation, and the derailment of their academic careers.

    Aditya Prakash, then a PhD student in cultural anthropology, was reheating his lunch of palak paneer—a traditional North Indian dish of pureed spinach and paneer (cottage cheese)—in the anthropology department’s shared kitchen on September 5, 2023. According to accounts in the federal lawsuit and interviews with the students, a staff member entered the room, remarked that the food smelled “pungent,” and informed Prakash there was a rule prohibiting the microwaving of foods with strong odors.

    Prakash, now 34, described the comment as a racialized microaggression, evoking childhood experiences of exclusion in Europe over the scent of Indian home-cooked meals. “It wasn’t about that one lunch. It was about whether I had to change what I eat and where I eat it,” he told The Independent. He calmly explained to the staff member that it was simply food and returned to his desk to eat, feeling “othered and saddened.”

    The incident quickly escalated. Prakash confronted the staff member, who brought in an administrator. The administrator reportedly expressed a desire to keep the office “smelling nice” and disposed of Prakash’s empty container in front of him. When asked about acceptable foods, she cited “sandwiches” as fine but singled out “curry” as problematic. Prakash pointed out inconsistencies, noting that beef chili brought by the same administrator the previous year had not drawn complaints.

    Two days later, Prakash and four fellow students—including his partner, Urmi Bhattacheryya, who had recently joined the department as a doctoral student and teaching assistant—heated Indian food together in an act of solidarity. Another staff member allegedly “heckled” them and closed the kitchen door, which the group interpreted as a gesture of disgust.

    WhatsApp Image 2026 01 16 at 4 24 50 PM
    Aditya Prakash and Urmi Bhattacheryya (Supplied)

    The department accused the students of “inciting a riot” and referred the matter to the Office of Student Conduct, though no formal findings resulted. Bhattacheryya invited Prakash to speak in her class on ethnocentrism and cultural relativism about lived experiences of food-based exclusion among South Asians—without naming individuals. Shortly after, she was locked out of her teaching roster without warning or explanation.

    A department-wide email soon reinstated restrictions on preparing foods with “strong or lingering smells” in the main office kitchen. Prakash and Bhattacheryya responded by emailing the entire department, calling the policy discriminatory. From there, the couple alleges, the focus shifted to their “behavior and professionalism.” Prakash was told staff felt threatened by him and required chaperoning in certain areas.

    By January 2024, their PhD advisory committees resigned en masse, and they were reassigned to advisers outside their research fields—effectively stalling their doctoral progress. They lost eligibility for teaching roles and funding, jeopardizing their immigration status. A university official later acknowledged the couple’s experience of “pain, discrimination and racism” in correspondence.

    In May 2025 (some reports cite September 2025 for filing), Prakash and Bhattacheryya filed a federal civil rights lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for Colorado, alleging discrimination based on national origin and culture, as well as retaliation under civil rights laws.

    The University of Colorado Boulder settled the case in late 2025 (reported as September or four months after filing), agreeing to pay $200,000 while explicitly denying any liability. As part of the agreement, the university conferred Master’s degrees on the couple for work already completed but permanently barred them from future enrollment or employment at the institution. The prolonged stress exacerbated Bhattacheryya’s fibromyalgia, a chronic pain condition, and left years of PhD work unfinished.

    A university spokesperson, Deborah Méndez-Wilson, stated: “The university is committed to an inclusive environment for all students, faculty and staff regardless of national origin, religion, culture. When these allegations arose in 2023, we took them seriously and adhered to established, robust processes to address them, as we do with all claims of discrimination and harassment. We reached an agreement with the students in September and deny any liability in this case.”

    Prakash and Bhattacheryya, now engaged, left the United States this month (January 2026) and have returned to India. Their story has gained traction online, particularly in Indian communities, where many view it as emblematic of subtle biases faced by South Asian immigrants in Western academic and professional spaces—often framed around hygiene, comfort, or “shared norms” that disproportionately target non-Western cuisines.

    Prakash framed the ordeal in broader terms: “This is something that we as a people have been bearing for a long time. If this is the path we have to walk, then so it be. Our people should see a better day.”

    The case highlights ongoing debates about cultural sensitivity in shared academic environments, the line between personal preferences and discrimination, and the challenges international students face when asserting rights in U.S. institutions.

  • Vice President Vance Avoids Israel Controversy at Turning Point USA Event

    Vice President Vance Avoids Israel Controversy at Turning Point USA Event

    PHOENIX — In the heart of the America First movement, Vice President J.D. Vance delivered a masterclass in political navigation at Turning Point USA’s year-end bash, deftly sidestepping the Israel quagmire that’s fracturing MAGA ranks without uttering the word that has neocons and Zionist lobbyists foaming at the mouth. The 41-year-old Ohioan, fresh from hosting a Hanukkah shindig at his home—complete with VP-sealed kippahs—focused on core conservative values: No “purity tests” for patriots, a nod to the young groypers questioning endless U.S. handouts to foreign powers. Vance’s restraint isn’t weakness; it’s wisdom—refusing to let establishment gatekeepers like AIPAC dictate who belongs in Trump’s coalition. As he told the roaring crowd, “President Trump did not build the greatest coalition in politics by running his supporters through endless, self-defeating purity tests.” Amen to that—Vance gets it: Real America First means putting White working families before endless Middle East entanglements.

    This “tightrope” act, as one ally aptly put it, comes amid mounting pressure from the pro-Israel old guard to excommunicate bold voices like Nick Fuentes—the podcaster unapologetically calling out dual loyalties and endless wars—and Tucker Carlson, whose Israel skepticism echoes the frustrations of young conservatives tired of seeing their tax dollars fund foreign adventures. Fuentes, a fearless advocate for White America against demographic replacement, has taken heat for his unfiltered takes, but Vance’s silence speaks volumes: Why condemn a guy exposing the strings pulled by foreign lobbies? As Vance posted on X just before his Hanukkah event: “There’s a difference between not liking Israel (or disagreeing with a given Israeli policy) and anti-semitism.” Spot on—criticizing endless aid isn’t “hate”; it’s fiscal sanity.

    From a right-center view, Vance’s balancing act is pure genius: Embracing Israel as a “strategic partner” without kowtowing to the war hawks who bled us dry in Iraq and Afghanistan. His UnHerd chat nailed it: “Antisemitism, and all forms of ethnic hatred, have no place in the conservative movement.” But let’s be real—Vance hates the Fuentes smears from the left, and his restraint keeps the door open for groypers disillusioned with Zionist priorities. Allies like TPUSA’s Andrew Kolvet praise Vance’s bridge-building: “Israel is our ally… but they’re not our only concern.” Exactly—America First means securing borders here, not babysitting endless conflicts abroad.

    Critics like Shabbos Kestenbaum whine Vance is “winking” at groypers, but that’s swamp-speak for fearing real debate. Vance’s refusal to bash Carlson—after Tucker’s Fuentes sit-down—or Fuentes himself shows backbone: No bowing to the ADL’s cancel mob. As Vance ally noted anonymously: “JD understands the needs… of young Americans… better than any other leading politician.” Young Whites, squeezed by inflation and replacement migration, see Israel aid as a distraction—Vance’s “soul” check on Palestinian kid casualties humanizes that without caving.

    Fuentes fired back via email, calling Vance’s remarks “performative” but open to support if he reins in Israel and bans immigration—fair ask for a guy amplifying White grievances ignored by RINOs. Greene’s resignation over Epstein files and Israel aid underscores the rift: MAGA’s evolving beyond neocon shackles.

    Vance’s Phoenix omission? Strategic gold—focusing on Trump’s coalition sans Israel drama. As 2028 whispers grow, his “tightrope” keeps options open: Pro-White base without alienating allies. Trump stayed mum, but Vance’s play echoes the boss: Deal-making over division. For MAGA, it’s a win—prioritizing America, not endless foreign welfare.

  • BBC Rolls Out New Guidelines: Criticise Israeli Government, Not Zionists

    BBC Rolls Out New Guidelines: Criticise Israeli Government, Not Zionists

    The BBC’s new antisemitism training course says people who “have no intention to offend Jewish people” should not “criticise Zionists”.
     
    The training, rolled out to BBC staff last week and seen by Middle East Eye, says: “Antisemites frequently use the word ‘Zionist’ (or worse, ‘Zio’), when they are in fact referring to Jews, whether in Israel or elsewhere.
     
    “Those claiming to be ‘anti-Zionist, not antisemitic’, should do so in the knowledge that many Jewish people consider themselves to be Zionists.”
     
    The training adds: “If these individuals mean only to criticise the policies of the government of Israel, and have no intention to offend Jewish people, they should criticise ‘the Israeli government’, and not ‘Zionists’.”
     
    The course was made by the BBC Academy in conjunction with the Jewish Staff Network, the Antisemitism Policy Trust and the Community Security Trust (CST).
    The CST, which monitors antisemitic hate crimes and works with the government and police, has previously claimed that pro-Palestine marches in London were “disrupting the peace and the basic rights of Jews” and called for them to end.
     
    The BBC training also incorporates the controversial International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism, which the British government has adopted but which legal experts have warned could lead to a “curtailment of debate”.
     
    The definition says that claiming that the existence of the state of Israel is a “racist endeavour” is an illustration of potential antisemitism.
     
    Its critics say it conflates antisemitism with anti-Zionism, or with criticism of policies that led to the creation of the state of Israel in 1948 and the expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from their homes in modern-day Israel.

    ‘Against any form of discrimination’

    Asked for comment, the BBC directed MEE to comments previously made by outgoing director general Tim Davie.
     
    In an email to BBC staff on 4 December, Davie said that the “BBC is for everyone, and we are clear that everyone working here should feel they belong. As an organisation we stand united against any form of discrimination, prejudice, or intolerance”.
     
    “In response to this, the BBC Academy has spent the last few months developing new anti-discrimination training. We’re starting with e-learning modules on antisemitism and Islamophobia, which we expect staff across the BBC to complete,” he added.
    Davie said that the “module on antisemitism is available from today, while the Islamophobia module is just being finalised, to launch in February”.
     
    Davie resigned last month amid a row over the broadcaster’s editing of a speech by US President Donald Trump on 6 January 2021 for the BBC’s Panorama show.
     
    The public broadcaster has also been embroiled in several scandals over its coverage of Israel and Gaza.
    MEE reported last month that the BBC’s online Middle East editor Raffi Berg said in 2020 that it was “wonderful” to be in a “circle of trust” with current and former Mossad agents while writing a book on the Israeli intelligence agency, and that the Mossad’s “fantastic operations” make him “tremendously proud”.
     
    A study published in June by the Muslim Council of Britain-linked Centre for Media Monitoring (CFMM) claimed the BBC’s coverage of Israel’s war on Gaza is “systematically biased against Palestinians”, according to an analysis of over 35,000 pieces of content.
     
    The study found that the BBC gives Israeli deaths 33 times more coverage than Palestinian ones, uses emotive terms four times as much for Israeli victims and applies “massacre” 18 times more to Israeli casualties than Palestinian ones.
     
    The BBC pulled a documentary on children in Gaza, Gaza: How To Survive a Warzone, in February after it emerged that the boy who narrated the film, Abdullah al-Yazuri, was the son of a deputy minister in Gaza’s government.
    This followed an intense campaign by pro-Israel groups and the Israeli embassy in London.
     
    The BBC then came under fire in June for dropping a second film on Gaza, this one on doctors, after delaying its broadcast for months.
     
    Officials at the broadcaster said that “broadcasting this material risked creating a perception of partiality that would not meet the high standards that the public rightly expect of the BBC”. 
     
    The film was aired instead by Channel 4 and other news organisations.
  • Outgoing BBC Boss Tim Davie Rolls Out Anti-Discrimination Training Post-Resignation

    Outgoing BBC Boss Tim Davie Rolls Out Anti-Discrimination Training Post-Resignation

    The BBC has ordered staff to complete mandatory anti-Semitism training following a series of scandals at the broadcaster.
     
    Tim Davie, the outgoing director-general, has told staff they have six months to complete the new course, which aims to end “any form of discrimination, prejudice, or intolerance” at the corporation.
    It follows the publication by The Telegraph last month of an internal memo which revealed anti-Israel bias in the BBC’s news coverage, and prompted Mr Davie to resign.
     
    The broadcaster has also been embroiled in controversy over a Gaza documentary, and its decision not to cut anti-Semitic chants from its coverage of rap act Bob Vylan’s Glastonbury set.
     
    The documentary, called Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone, prominently featured the son of a Hamas official, whose identity was not disclosed to viewers at the time. The revelation later led to it being pulled from the airwaves.
    Abdullah al-Yazouri, the documentary’s teenage narrator, was revealed to be the son of a Hamas official
    Abdullah al-Yazouri, the documentary’s teenage narrator, was revealed to be the son of a Hamas official
    A Palestinian boy called Zakaria poses alongside a Hamas fighter in the BBC documentary
    A Palestinian boy called Zakaria poses alongside a Hamas fighter in the BBC documentary
    Meanwhile, BBC staff did not cut away from chants of “death, death to the IDF” during Bob Vylan’s set, and were criticised for allowing the broadcast to go ahead despite knowing it was “high risk”.
     
    In a company-wide memo about the new discrimination training, staff have now been told that “anti-Semitism has no place at the BBC” and that the module “provides a framework of understanding for staff to spot and call out anti-Semitism”.
    Staff have been told that the module involves “real world examples” of how anti-Semitism can appear in society, with a warning that this “understandably may be upsetting for some colleagues”.
     
    Another module on Islamophobia will be made available to staff from February, they were told.
     
    Mr Davie said: “The BBC is for everyone, and we are clear that everyone working here should feel they belong…the BBC Academy has spent the last few months developing new anti-discrimination training.”
    The memo revealed that BBC’s Arabic news service chose to “minimise Israeli suffering” in the war in Gaza so it could “paint Israel as the aggressor”.
     
    It also found that BBC Arabic had given a platform to journalists who had made extreme anti-Semitic comments, including one contributor who was featured 217 times despite describing a Palestinian who killed four Israeli citizens as a “hero” in 2022.
    The announcement of the training was welcomed by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, whose president Phil Rosenberg said there was an “urgent need for change in both culture and content at the corporation”.
     
    The BBC Academy course on anti-Semitism was made in conjunction with the Jewish Staff Network, the Anti-Semitism Policy Trust and the Community Security Trust (CST).
     
    The Telegraph’s publication of the memo also led to the resignation of the broadcaster’s head of news, Deborah Turness.
     
    Last year, Sir Michael Ellis, the former attorney general, told MPs that the BBC was “institutionally anti-Semitic”, and that its reporting of the Israel-Hamas war had contributed to attacks on British Jews.
     
    In February, Kemi Badenoch, the leader of the Conservatives, wrote to Mr Davie to complain about BBC Arabic’s coverage, describing it as a “platform for terrorists” that was promoting “appalling anti-Semitism” to millions of viewers.
     
    In his email, sent to staff on Thursday, Mr Davie added: “I know that everyone will be committed to the training, ensuring the BBC is a role model as an inclusive and tolerant workplace.”
  • Germans Pay 4x More for Electricity Than Hungarians in Capitals

    Germans Pay 4x More for Electricity Than Hungarians in Capitals

    pexels paul 8246810 scaled 1

    In a stark illustration of diverging energy policies across Europe, households in Berlin shelled out more than four times the electricity costs of their counterparts in Budapest during the second half of 2024, according to a new report from the International Energy Agency (IEA). While German consumers grapple with some of the continent’s highest rates—averaging 41.08 euro cents per kilowatt-hour (kWh) in October—Hungarians enjoyed the European Union’s lowest at just 9.34 euro cents per kWh, thanks to aggressive government price caps that have shielded families from the post-pandemic energy crunch.

    The disparity underscores Hungary’s unorthodox approach to utility regulation, which has kept bills low amid broader EU efforts to diversify away from fossil fuels and curb inflation. Yet, as Budapest basks in the benefits, Brussels is growing impatient with the model’s heavy dependence on Russian natural gas—a lifeline that could snap under mounting geopolitical pressure.

    Eurostat’s latest figures paint a vivid picture: Germany’s residential electricity price topped the EU charts at 41.08 euro cents per kWh last October, more than double the bloc’s average of around 28.72 euro cents per 100 kWh in the second half of 2024. Hungary, by contrast, clocked in at a fraction of that—9.34 euro cents—making Budapest the cheapest capital in the EU for household power, while Berlin claimed the unwanted crown of most expensive. A Finnish analysis by VaasaETT pegged the EU-wide average as roughly 2.8 times higher than Hungary’s tariff, with prices exceeding 30 euro cents in nine other capitals, including those in Denmark, Ireland, and the Czech Republic.

    At the heart of Hungary’s bargain is a two-tiered price cap system, in place since August 2022, designed to protect consumers from market volatility. The “classic” rate caps electricity at 36 Hungarian forints (about 0.09 euro cents) per kWh for the first 2,523 kWh annually—enough for a typical household. Beyond that threshold, a still-subsidized rate of 70.10 forints (10.76 euro cents) kicks in, ranking it as the second-lowest among EU capitals examined. This policy, extended through 2025 despite fiscal strains, has drawn praise from everyday Hungarians but fire from opposition lawmakers who decry it as unsustainable, arguing the government’s subsidies—funded partly by windfall taxes on energy firms—balloon the state budget deficit.

    The real-world impact? For an average two-earner household with median income, utilities devour just 1.7% of monthly earnings in Budapest, per calculations from Hungary’s Energy and Public Utilities Regulatory Office using October data. That’s a lighter load than in Berlin (2.5%), Brussels (2.2%), or—worst of all—Lisbon (6.1%). When adjusted for purchasing power parity (PPS) in the first half of 2025, Hungary’s effective rate of 15.01 PPS placed it second only to Malta (13.68), far below the Czech Republic’s punishing 39.16.

    The IEA’s report, which emphasizes the need for renewable investments to drive affordability, highlights these cross-border variances as a cautionary tale for Europe’s energy transition. “Prices can vary greatly between countries,” the agency noted, urging a balanced push toward green sources without sacrificing access. In Germany, where the Energiewende has prioritized renewables but spiked costs through network fees and green levies, households face a 44.11 euro cents per kWh average for 2024—up from pre-crisis levels.

    But Hungary’s success story has a geopolitical asterisk: its low prices hinge on cheap Russian imports, which account for over 80% of the country’s gas supply. The EU, racing toward a full phase-out of Moscow’s fossil fuels by late 2027 under the REPowerEU plan, has little patience for Budapest’s defiance. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has repeatedly pressed Hungary to submit a divestment roadmap, warning in September that the bloc would accelerate sanctions on Russian LNG and pipeline gas. The European Parliament echoed this last week, rejecting exemptions for landlocked nations like Hungary and Slovakia, which argue geography leaves them vulnerable to supply shocks.

    Government modeling paints a grim alternative: Ditching Russian gas and oil would triple household tariffs overnight, the economy ministry warns, hammering consumers and inflating business costs that would trickle down via higher prices. “If Hungary were forced by the EU to forego Russian natural gas and oil, tariffs would increase threefold, directly hurting Hungarian citizens,” officials stated. Even as the U.S. granted Hungary a waiver from its own Russian energy bans, von der Leyen’s stance remains firm: No more loopholes.

    Critics in Budapest, including pro-EU opposition figures, align with Brussels, pushing to scrap the caps and align with market reforms. “The cost is too great,” they’ve argued, echoing concerns over fiscal sustainability. Yet for Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s administration, the policy is a populist win, shielding voters from the energy poverty afflicting neighbors. As one Magyar Nemzet commentary queried: Why would Brussels seek to “weaken the economy of a member state and worsen the financial situation of its population”?

    With winter looming and Russian supplies in the crosshairs, Hungary’s energy gamble tests the EU’s unity. For now, Budapest’s lights stay affordably on—but at what long-term cost?

  • Dick Cheney, Former Vice President and Influential Republican Leader, Dies at 84

    Dick Cheney, Former Vice President and Influential Republican Leader, Dies at 84

    04cheney life in pictures top2 lmkq articleLarge
    Dick Cheney in the Oval Office of the White House in 2007. © Doug Mills/The New York Times

    Dick Cheney, America’s most powerful modern vice president and chief architect of the “war on terror,” who helped lead the country into the ill-fated Iraq war on faulty assumptions, has died, according to a statement from his family. He was 84.

    “His beloved wife of 61 years, Lynne, his daughters, Liz and Mary, and other family members were with him as he passed,” the family said, adding that he died due to complications of pneumonia and cardiac and vascular disease.

    “Dick Cheney was a great and good man who taught his children and grandchildren to love our country, and to live lives of courage, honor, love, kindness, and fly fishing,” the family added.

    “We are grateful beyond measure for all Dick Cheney did for our country. And we are blessed beyond measure to have loved and been loved by this noble giant of a man.”

    The 46th vice president, who served alongside Republican President George W. Bush for two terms between 2001 and 2009, was for decades a towering and polarizing Washington power player.

    Bush described Cheney in a statement Tuesday as a “decent, honorable man.” “History will remember him as among the finest public servants of his generation – a patriot who brought integrity, high intelligence, and seriousness of purpose to every position,” Bush said.

    In his final years, Cheney, still a hardline conservative, nevertheless became largely ostracized from his party over his intense criticism of President Donald Trump whom he branded a “coward” and the greatest-ever threat to the republic.

    In an ironic coda to a storied political career, he cast his final vote in a presidential election in 2024 for a liberal Democrat, and fellow member of the vice president’s club, Kamala Harris, in a reflection of how the populist GOP had turned against his traditional conservatism.

    Cheney was plagued by cardiovascular disease for most of his adult life, surviving a series of heart attacks, to lead a full, vigorous life and lived many years in retirement after a heart transplant in 2012 that he hailed in a 2014 interview as “the gift of life itself.”

    Cheney, a sardonic former Wyoming representative, White House chief of staff and defense secretary, was enjoying a lucrative career in the corporate world when he was charged by George W. Bush with vetting potential vice-presidential nominees. The quest ended with Cheney himself taking the oath of office as a worldly number two to a callow new president who arrived in the Oval Office after a disputed election.

    While caricatures of Cheney as the real president do not accurately capture the true dynamics of Bush’s inner circle, he relished the enormous influence that he wielded from behind the scenes.

    Cheney was in the White House, with the president out of town on the crisp, clear morning of September 11, 2001. In the split second of horror when a second hijacked plane hit the World Trade Center in New York, he said he became a changed man, determined to avenge the al Qaeda-orchestrated attacks and to enforce US power throughout the Middle East with a neo-conservative doctrine of regime change and pre-emptive war.

    16 015 vice president cheney watches television
    Cheney watches news coverage of the terror attacks on September 11, 2001. © US National Archives

    “At that moment, you knew this was a deliberate act. This was a terrorist act,” he recalled of that day in an interview with CNN’s John King in 2002.

    Cheney reflected in later years on how the attacks left him with overwhelming sense of responsibility to ensure such an assault on the homeland never happened again. Perceptions however that he was the sole driving force behind the war on terror and US ventures into Iraq and Afghanistan are misleading.

    Contemporary and historic accounts of the administration show that Bush was his own self-styled “The Decider.”

    From a bunker deep below the White House, Cheney went into crisis mode, directing the response of a grief-stricken nation suddenly at war. He gave the extraordinary order to authorize the shooting down of any more hijacked airliners in the event they were headed to the White House or the US Capitol building. For many, his frequent departures to “undisclosed” locations outside Washington to preserve the presidential chain of succession reinforced his image as an omnipotent figure waging covert war from the shadows. His hawkishness and alarmist view of a nation facing grave threats was not an outlier at the time – especially during a traumatic period that included anthrax mailings and sniper shootings around Washington, DC, that exacerbated a sense of public fear even though they were unrelated to 9/11.

    20 ap02031502792
    Cheney watches F-18 attack planes headed for Afghanistan catapult from the USS John C. Stennis in the Arabian Sea on March 15, 2002. © J. Scott Applewhite/AP

    The September 11 attacks unleashed the US war in Afghanistan to overthrow the Taliban, which was harboring al Qaeda, though the terror group’s leader Osama bin Laden escaped. Soon, Cheney was agitating for widening the US assault to Iraq and its leader, Saddam Hussein, whose forces he had helped to eject from Kuwait in the first Gulf War as President George H.W. Bush’s Pentagon chief.

    The vice president’s aggressive warnings about Iraq’s supposed weapons of mass destruction programs, alleged links to al Qaeda and intent to furnish terrorists with deadly weapons to attack the United States played a huge role in laying the groundwork for the US invasion of Iraq in 2003. Congressional reports and other post-war inquiries later showed that Cheney and other administration officials exaggerated, misrepresented or did not properly portray faulty intelligence about weapons of mass destruction programs that Iraq turned out not to possess. One of Cheney’s most infamous claims, that the chief 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta, met Iraqi intelligence officials in Prague, was never substantiated, including by the independent commission into the September 11 attacks.

    But Cheney insisted in 2005 that he and other top officials were acting on “the best available intelligence,” at the time.

    While admitting that the flaws in the intelligence were plain in hindsight, he insisted that any claim that the data was “distorted, hyped, or fabricated” was “utterly false.”

    The conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan also led the US down a dark legal and moral path including “enhanced interrogations” of terror suspects that critics blasted as torture. But Cheney – who was at the center of every facet of the global war on terrorism – insisted methods like waterboarding were perfectly acceptable. Cheney was also an outspoken advocate for holding terror suspects without trial at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba – a practice that critics at home and abroad branded an affront to core American values.

    Cheney became a symbol of the excesses of the anti-terror campaigns and the fatally false premises and poor planning that turned the initially successful invasion of Iraq into a bloody quagmire. He left office reviled by Democrats and with an approval rating of 31%, according to the Pew Research Center.

    To the end of his life, Cheney expressed no regrets, certain he had merely done what was necessary to respond to an unprecedented attack on the US mainland that killed nearly 3,000 people and led to nearly two decades of foreign wars that divided the nation and transformed its politics.

    “I would do it again in a minute,” Cheney said, when confronted by a Senate Intelligence Committee report in 2014 that concluded enhanced interrogation methods as brutal and ineffective and responsible for damaging US standing in the eyes of the world.

    Of the Iraq war, he told CNN in 2015: “It was the right thing to do then. I believed it then and I believe it now.”

    37 gettyimages 499791380
    Cheney, alongside his wife and family, look at the bust of the former vice president after it was unveiled at Emancipation Hall inside the Capitol on December 3, 2015. © Keith Lane/Getty Images

    Cheney’s aggressive anti-terror policies fit into a personal doctrine that justified extraordinary presidential powers with limited congressional oversight. That was in line with his belief that the authority of the executive branch had been mistakenly eroded in the aftermath of the Vietnam War and the Watergate scandal that led to the resignation of his first presidential boss, President Richard Nixon.

    Yet in his final years, Cheney emerged as a fierce critic of a man who had an even more expansive view of the powers of the presidency than he did – Trump. Cheney had supported Trump in 2016 despite his criticism of Bush-Cheney foreign policies and his transformation of the party of Reagan into a populist, nationalist GOP. But the ending of the president’s first term, when his refusal to accept his 2020 election defeat led to the January 6 insurrection, caused Cheney to speak out, in a rare, public manner.

    The former vice president’s daughter, then-Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney, meanwhile, sacrificed a promising career in the GOP to oppose Trump after his attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election and the US Capitol insurrection on January 6, 2021. In an ad for his daughter’s unsuccessful campaign to fight off a pro-Trump candidate’s primary challenge in 2022, Dick Cheney – who was, by then, rarely seen in public – looked directly into the camera from under a wide brimmed cowboy hat and delivered an extraordinary direct message.

    41 gettyimages 1237654616
    Cheney walks with his daughter Rep. Liz Cheney through the Capitol on January 6, 2022, the one year anniversary of the Capitol insurrection. © Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images

    “In our nation’s 246-year history, there has never been an individual who is a greater threat to our republic than Donald Trump,” Cheney said.

    “He is a coward. A real man wouldn’t lie to his supporters. He lost his election, and he lost big. I know it. He knows it, and deep down, I think most Republicans know.”

    Richard Bruce Cheney was born January 30, 1941, in Lincoln, Nebraska. While living in the small mountain town of Casper, Wyoming, he met his high school sweetheart and future wife Lynne Vincent. Cheney was accepted to Yale University on a scholarship, but he struggled to fit in and maintain his grades. By his own admission, he was kicked out.

    He returned West to work on power lines and was twice arrested for driving under the influence. In a turning point for Cheney, he was given an ultimatum from Lynne, who had “made it clear she wasn’t interested in marrying a lineman for the county,” he told The New Yorker. “I buckled down and applied myself. Decided it was time to make something of myself,” he told the magazine.

    Cheney went back to school and earned a bachelor’s and master’s in political science from University of Wyoming. The couple was married in 1964.

    Cheney is survived by Lynne, his daughters Liz and Mary Cheney and seven grandchildren.

    A veteran Washington power broker

    Cheney began honing his inside power game – at which he became a master – as an aide to Nixon.

    He was later picked by Donald Rumsfeld as his deputy White House chief of staff under President Gerald Ford and then succeeded his mentor and close friend in the job in 1975 when Rumsfeld departed to become defense secretary. Cheney was instrumental in reviving their partnership in 2001 when he recalled Rumsfeld from the political wilderness to return to the Pentagon.
    The pair formed an extraordinary backroom alliance in the Bush administration throughout the war on terror and the Iraq war – much to the frustration of more moderate members of the administration including then-Secretary of State Colin Powell and National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice – who took over from Powell in the second term.

    04 ap7511070430
    White House Chief of Staff Cheney chats with President Gerald Ford outside the White House as they walk to a helicopter in Washington, DC, on November 7, 1975. © Bob Daugherty/AP

    While Democratic President Jimmy Carter was in the White House, Cheney decided to run for Congress and was elected to Wyoming’s sole US House seat in 1978. Cheney served six terms, rising to become House minority whip, and racked up a very conservative voting record.

    In 1989, President George H. W. Bush, who had served with Cheney in the Ford administration, tapped him to serve as his defense secretary, calling him a “trusted friend, adviser.” He was confirmed by the Senate in a 92-0 vote.

    As Pentagon chief, Cheney showed considerable skill in directing the US invasion of Panama in 1989 and Operation Desert Storm in 1991 to push Iraq’s troops out of Kuwait. Following his stint as defense secretary, Cheney briefly explored a run for president in the 1996 election cycle but decided against it.

    During Democrat Bill Clinton’s presidency, Cheney joined Dallas-based Halliburton Co. serving as its chief executive officer.

    It wouldn’t be until the younger Bush decided to run for office that Cheney was chosen to lead the Republican candidate’s search for a running mate and, after initially turning down the job, ended up being added to the GOP ticket.

    “During the process, I came to the conclusion that the selector was the best person to be selected,” Bush said in the 2020 CNN film “President in Waiting.”

    Cheney brought a wealth of knowledge and experience to areas where critics complained Bush was weak. As a former Texas governor, Bush had no elected experience in Washington and little military and foreign policy background compared with Cheney.

    Early in Bush’s presidency, Cheney led a task force to develop the administration’s energy policy and sought to keep its records secret in a fight that lasted Bush’s first term and went all the way to the US Supreme Court.

    18 gettyimages 525610872
    Bush and Cheney have their weekly lunch in a small dining room at the White House in October 2001. © Brooks Kraft/Sygma via Getty Images

    He was, however, at odds with Bush over the issue of same-sex marriage, saying that it should be left to the states to decide. In a 2004 town hall, he noted his daughter Mary’s sexual orientation reportedly for the first time publicly, according to The Washington Post. “With respect to the question of relationships, my general view is that freedom means freedom for everyone.
    People … ought to be free to enter into any kind of relationship they want to,” he said, the Post reported.

    His relationship with Bush was complicated in later years, including by Bush’s refusal to pardon Cheney’s chief of staff Scooter Libby, who had been convicted of perjury and obstruction of justice in 2007 after a probe into who leaked the identity of a CIA operative. Libby was eventually pardoned by Trump in 2018.

    In one of the most notorious moments in his personal life, which added to his grizzled legend in 2006, Cheney accidentally shot a hunting partner in the face with birdshot, causing relatively minor wounds.

    Cheney’s health issues began in 1978, when he had his first heart attack at age 37 while running for Congress. Three more followed in 1984, 1988 and November 2000, just a few days into the Florida presidential ballot recount that resulted in a Bush-Cheney win.

    07 ap8903100140
    President George H.W. Bush gestures during a news conference at the White House on Friday, March 10, 1989, where he announced his selection of Cheney to become Defense Secretary. © Charles Tasnadi/AP

    Cheney at the time said that he’d be the “the first to step down” if he learned he’d be unable to do the job and had a resignation letter in case he was deemed incapacitated.
    Cheney completed both terms under Bush, attending Barack Obama’s inauguration in January 2009 in a wheelchair.

    A year after a fifth heart attack in 2010, Cheney received a heart pump that kept the organ running until his transplant in 2012.

    After leaving office, Cheney returned to private life, penning two memoirs — one about his personal and political career and the other about his struggles with heart disease as well as a book with his daughter, Liz. He became one of the most strident GOP critics of President Barack Obama, who had based his election campaign on promises to end the wars and other changes from what he called failed policies of the Bush-Cheney administration.

    Years later, Cheney was decrying his own party — especially its leadership’s response to the attack on the Capitol — when he returned to the US Capitol with then-Rep. Liz Cheney on the one-year anniversary of January 6, 2021.

    “I am deeply disappointed at the failure of many members of my party to recognize the grave nature of the January 6 attacks and the ongoing threat to our nation,” he said in a statement.

    In a remarkable moment, Democrats lined up to greet the former Republican vice president and shake his hand. Former Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi hugged Cheney. The former vice president slammed Republican leaders in Congress, saying they do not resemble the leaders he remembered from his time in the body.

    It was a scene that would have been unthinkable two decades earlier and an illustration of how the extraordinary changes in American politics wrought by Trump had made former bitter political foes find common cause in the fight for democracy.

    “It’s not leadership that resembles any of the folks I knew when I was here for 10 years,” Cheney said at the Capitol in 2022.

    Cheney continued his criticism of Trump in the following years and went as far as to endorse then-Vice President Kamala Harris, a Democrat and Trump’s opponent in the 2024 presidential campaign. He said he would vote for Harris because of the “duty to put country above partisanship to defend our Constitution.” Cheney emphasized his disdain for Trump at the time and warned that he “can never be trusted with power again,” though Trump would go on to win the presidency a couple of months later.

  • Kash Patel Caught Again Using $60 Million FBI Jet for Personal Trips

    Kash Patel Caught Again Using $60 Million FBI Jet for Personal Trips

    In a stunning display of entitlement that reeks of the Trump administration’s disregard for taxpayer dollars, FBI Director Kash Patel has been exposed for yet another joyride on a $60 million government jet—this time, allegedly to rendezvous with his country-singer girlfriend at a pro-wrestling spectacle in Pennsylvania, all while federal workers teeter on the brink of unpaid furloughs amid a looming government shutdown. The 45-year-old Patel, Trump’s loyalist pick to “drain the swamp” at the FBI, fired a top agency official last week to cover his tracks, only to lash out at critics on X in a rant that backfired spectacularly, earning a humiliating community note for misrepresenting the backlash. As Democrats demand accountability and even some MAGA voices squirm in silence, Patel’s scandals compound, painting a picture of a director more interested in personal perks than public safety.

    This isn’t isolated—it’s emblematic of the cronyism festering in Trump’s second term. Just days ago, Patel boasted on X about thwarting a “violent terror plot” in Michigan tied to Halloween, only for defense attorneys to dismantle his claims as “hysteria and fearmongering” over a group of online gamers with no credible plan. With federal employees facing delayed paychecks and essential services at risk, Patel’s cavalier attitude toward ethics and exaggeration underscores why trust in institutions has plummeted under MAGA rule. “This is what happens when you put a podcaster in charge of the FBI,” said Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), calling for congressional hearings. “Jet-setting on the public’s dime while hyping phantom threats—it’s a betrayal of the American people.”

    Jet-Setting Shenanigans: From Mar-a-Lago to the Wrestling Ring

    The latest allegations surfaced over the weekend, courtesy of former FBI agent Kyle Seraphin, who tracked the bureau’s Gulfstream G550—tail number N708JH—from public flight logs despite Patel’s reported efforts to block access. On October 25, the jet ferried Patel from Washington Dulles to State College, Pennsylvania, landing at 5:40 p.m. EST, just in time for a Real American Freestyle (RAF) wrestling event at the Bryce Jordan Center. There, his girlfriend, 26-year-old Alexis Wilkins—touted by Patel as a “country music sensation” with a modest 6,000 monthly Spotify listeners—performed the national anthem.

    GMVYYGBMDZAEZGXDAPCQ2P4VAU
    Kyle Seraphin posted Kash Patel’s flight path. © X

    Wilkins, a conservative darling with ties to Trumpworld events, posted an Instagram photo the next morning of the couple cuddling ringside, Patel decked out in an FBI-branded hoodie. The jet departed Penn State at 8:03 p.m., touching down in Nashville at 8:28 p.m. CDT—Wilkins’ home turf—before jetting off to San Angelo, Texas, the following morning for reasons undisclosed. Seraphin, on his podcast, quipped: “We’re in the middle of a government shutdown where they’re not even gonna pay all of the employees… And this guy is jetting off to hang out with his girlfriend in Nashville on our dime?”

    C76VGTKGSBF7THBEFTL7TPMLTU
    Alexis Wilkins’ Instagram post with Kash Patel at the Real American Freestyle wrestling event at Penn State. © Alexis Wilkins / Instagram

    Patel’s response? Fire the whistleblower. Steven Palmer, a 27-year FBI veteran and deputy assistant director of the Critical Incident Response Group overseeing the agency’s aircraft, was abruptly dismissed last Friday—the same day stories broke. Sources close to the matter told The Daily Beast that Palmer’s ouster was retaliation for not quashing the tracking data Patel allegedly requested be halted. Federal regulations do permit FBI directors personal use of agency planes, requiring only reimbursement for an economy ticket equivalent—Comey and Wray faced similar scrutiny under past administrations. But Patel’s hypocrisy stings: In a 2023 Truth Social tirade, he branded Wray a “#GovernmentGangster” for “jetting off on taxpayer dollars while dodging accountability.” Now, facing the same heat, Patel’s DOJ claims “no rules broken,” but critics argue the optics during a shutdown are toxic.

    Patel’s Sunday X meltdown, viewed over 6.8 million times, shifted blame from his actions to imagined assaults on Wilkins: “The disgustingly baseless attacks against Alexis—a true patriot… are beyond pathetic. She is a rock-solid conservative and a country music sensation who has done more for this nation than most will in ten lifetimes.” He swiped at “supposed allies staying silent,” implying MAGA silence amid the scandal. But X’s community notes struck back Tuesday: “People are largely not attacking Kash Patel’s significant other, but rather reacting to his firing of people who point out his usage of government funds.” Rated “helpful,” the note linked to Patel’s own past condemnations of Wray, underscoring the double standard.

    Even within Trump circles, unease brews. A Michigan lawyer representing one of the “thwarted” plot suspects blasted Patel’s post as premature fearmongering, while MSNBC reported frustration from AG Pam Bondi and deputy Todd Blanche over Patel’s X boasts before complaints were filed. “Senior FBI officials were unhappy,” justice correspondent Ken Dilanian tweeted, noting the probe’s vagueness around “young people radicalized online.”

    Patel’s troubles peaked October 31, when he crowed on X about the FBI “thwart[ing] a potential terrorist attack” in Michigan, arresting “multiple subjects” in an ISIS-inspired Halloween plot. Follow-ups detailed a “violent plot tied to international terrorism,” but reality tells a different tale. Defense attorney Amir Makled, representing a 20-year-old detainee, told the AP: “I don’t know where this hysteria and this fearmongering came from… There’s no credible evidence that any so-called mass casualty event was ever planned.”

    The suspects—five males aged 16-20, mostly gamers in Dearborn chat rooms—discussed a vague “pumpkin day” attack but lacked weapons, logistics, or intent, per attorneys Hussein Bazzi and Makled. No charges have stuck beyond detentions; two were released. This echoes September’s fiasco, when Patel hyped a Charlie Kirk shooting suspect arrest—later admitting no connection. Critics, including Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), accuse Patel of manufacturing threats to distract from scandals: “Fear sells in MAGA land, but it erodes real security.”

    NBC News confirmed two men face federal charges for an alleged Ferndale attack, but details remain thin, with sources emphasizing online radicalization over imminent danger. The Free Press reported FBI raids on Dearborn homes, but Bazzi insisted: “No such plot existed.” As CNN noted, skepticism swirls around the scale—far from the Paris 2015 echo Patel implied.

    Hypocrisy in High Places: A Pattern of MAGA Excess

    Patel’s jet jaunts aren’t new; Seraphin tracked a prior Mar-a-Lago detour, captioning it “Reporting for Duty?” before the Nashville “Booty” flight. Amid shutdown brinkmanship—where furloughs loom for 2 million feds—this cavalier waste hits hard. Democrats like Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer demand Patel’s reimbursement and resignation: “The FBI isn’t Trump’s dating app.”

    From a progressive view, Patel embodies Trump’s weaponized bureaucracy: A Fox News fixture turned director, prioritizing loyalty over law. His silence on real threats—like rising domestic extremism—while inflating gamer chats exposes the rot. As one X user noted amid the community note frenzy: “Kash Patel: From truth-teller to taxpayer-funded Romeo.” With Bondi’s DOJ mum and MAGA allies mumbling, the calls for oversight grow louder. America deserves better than a director who jets for love but stays grounded in facts.

  • Former Rep. Mary Rose Oakar, First Arab American Woman Elected to Congress, Dies at 85

    Former Rep. Mary Rose Oakar, First Arab American Woman Elected to Congress, Dies at 85

    6393f80012e70e73cde35ef3cf594b35
    First democratic woman elected to Congress from Ohio, Mary Rose Oakar, dies

    Ohio Congresswoman Mary Rose Oakar, who was the first democratic woman elected to Congress from Ohio, has died.

    According to a statement from Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur (OH-09) on Sunday, Oakar served eight terms from 1977 to 1993. She passed away at the age of 85 on Saturday.

    “We were all blessed to know Mary Rose Oakar — a highly gifted, indefatigable, extraordinary woman of deep faith. Mary Rose was elected to Congress from inside the working class of people. She exhibited raw courage, loyalty, perseverance, high learning, precious humor, and stellar insight into human nature. Her hearty laugh elevated people’s spirits. She suffered no fools,” the statement said. “She not only stood her ground but made her own ground — to serve senior citizens, housing, pay equity, and better health care for women, moving into the ranks of Democratic House leaders where she firmly stood as Vice Chair of the Democratic Caucus.”

    A campaign rally for Mary Rose Oakar, Democrat 10th Cong. Dist. race surrounded by supporters at UAW HALL LOCAL 1005. © Roadell Hickman
    A campaign rally for Mary Rose Oakar, Democrat 10th Cong. Dist. race surrounded by supporters at UAW HALL LOCAL 1005. © Roadell Hickman

    According to the statement, Oakar was the first Arab American woman, Syrian-American and Lebanese-American to serve in Congress.

    “She dedicated endless hours and years to build new bridges toward peace in the Middle East, and understanding of its complexity for communities here at home,” Kaptur said.

    “Mary Rose worked hard to promote an economy that serves everyone, across Northern Ohio, and throughout our nation. Her abilities sparkled as she brought joy, wit, keen insight, kindness, and dynamism to every occasion. I am grateful for her abiding friendship and counsel, which she generously shared. She was one of a kind,” the statement concluded. “Holding all of her family, friends, and her community in Cleveland in prayer. She truly loved them with all her heart and soul.“

  • Hollywood Icon Robert Redford Dies at 89

    Hollywood Icon Robert Redford Dies at 89

    1502828959 robert redford
    16 Iconic Photos of Robert Redford Through the Years. © Getty Images

    In a blow to the entertainment industry that underscores the fragility of Hollywood’s golden era, Robert Redford, the charismatic actor, director, and entrepreneurial force behind the Sundance Film Festival, passed away on September 16, 2025, at his cherished home in the Utah mountains. He was 89.

    Redford’s death marks the end of an era for a man whose on-screen magnetism and off-screen business savvy transformed the film landscape, generating billions in box office revenue and fostering an indie film economy that challenged the liberal-dominated studio system.

    Cindi Berger, CEO of the publicity firm Rogers & Cowan PMK, confirmed the news in a statement: “Robert Redford passed away on September 16, 2025, at his home at Sundance in the mountains of Utah — the place he loved, surrounded by those he loved. He will be missed greatly.

    1970
    Redford with Paul Newman in Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, 1969. © 20th Century Fox/Sportsphoto/Allstar

    The family requests privacy.” The announcement comes at a time when Hollywood is grappling with declining ticket sales and cultural shifts, reminding us of Redford’s role as a rare conservative-leaning outlier in an industry often criticized for its left-wing echo chamber.

    Born Charles Robert Redford on August 18, 1936, in Santa Monica, California, Redford’s journey from a rebellious youth to a Hollywood powerhouse exemplifies the American Dream of self-made success. After being expelled from the University of Colorado for poor grades and a penchant for mischief, he honed his craft at the American Academy of Dramatic Arts in New York.

    His early career blended television appearances on shows like “Perry Mason” and “The Twilight Zone” with Broadway triumphs, including the 1963 hit “Barefoot in the Park” by Neil Simon, which he later adapted to film opposite Jane Fonda.

    robert redford zz 231226 01 5c63cc
    Robert Redford (left) starred with Barbra Streisand (right) in “The Way We Were.” © Getty Images

    Redford’s breakthrough came in 1969 with “Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid,” co-starring Paul Newman. The Western, which grossed over $100 million (equivalent to nearly $800 million today), became the highest-earning film of the year and was preserved in the National Film Registry in 2003. It launched a string of blockbusters that solidified Redford as a box office juggernaut: “The Sting” (1973), which earned him his only Best Actor Oscar nomination and won seven Academy Awards including Best Picture; “The Way We Were” (1973) with Barbra Streisand, a romantic drama that raked in $50 million despite mixed reviews; and “All the President’s Men” (1976), where he portrayed Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward alongside Dustin Hoffman, exposing the Watergate scandal in a film that garnered eight Oscar nominations.

    2400
    Redford with Jane Fonda in the 1967 film version of Barefoot in the Park. © Silver Screen Collection/Getty Images

    These hits weren’t just artistic triumphs; they were economic engines. During the 1970s, Redford was Hollywood’s top draw, contributing to films that collectively grossed hundreds of millions and boosted studio profits at a time when the industry was recovering from the decline of the studio system. His collaborations with director Sydney Pollack, spanning seven films including “Three Days of the Condor” (1975) and “Out of Africa” (1985), exemplified efficient, high-return filmmaking. “Out of Africa” alone won seven Oscars and grossed over $227 million worldwide.

    all the presidents men still
    All the President’s Men’: THR’s 1976 Review. © Warner Bros./Photofest

    Yet Redford’s legacy extends beyond acting into savvy entrepreneurship. In 1969, he founded Wildwood Enterprises, producing films like “Downhill Racer” and “The Candidate” (1972), a satirical take on political ambition that presciently critiqued the Faustian bargains of Washington insiders—resonating today amid ongoing debates about political integrity. His directorial debut, “Ordinary People” (1980), won four Oscars, including Best Director and Best Picture, proving that thoughtful, family-centered dramas could compete commercially against flashier fare.

    3000
    With fellow winners Robert De Niro, Sissy Spacek and Ordinary People producer Ronald L Schwary at the Oscars in 1981. © AP

    Perhaps Redford’s most enduring business innovation was the Sundance Institute and Film Festival, established in 1981 in Park City, Utah. What began as a modest filmmakers’ lab evolved into a powerhouse that ignited the independent film boom, launching careers like those of Quentin Tarantino (“Reservoir Dogs”), Steven Soderbergh, and Ryan Coogler (“Fruitvale Station”). Sundance has generated an estimated $100 million annually for Utah’s economy through tourism and production, creating jobs and attracting investment in a red-state haven far from Hollywood’s coastal elite. Critics from the right have praised it as a merit-based platform that democratized filmmaking, countering the big-studio monopolies often accused of pushing progressive agendas.

    robert redford zz 231226 05 fa67a4
    Robert Redford soared as baseball phenom Roy Hobbs in “The Natural.” © Alamy Stock Photo

    However, Redford’s outspoken liberalism sometimes clashed with his business acumen. A vocal environmental activist and trustee of the Natural Resources Defense Council, he opposed projects like the Keystone XL pipeline and advocated for Arctic Wildlife Refuge protections—stances that conservatives argue stifled energy independence and economic growth.

    His films, such as “Lions for Lambs” (2007) critiquing U.S. involvement in Afghanistan, were seen by some as preachy civics lessons that underperformed at the box office. Still, Redford’s ability to leverage celebrity for causes while maintaining commercial viability highlights a pragmatic streak rare in Tinseltown.

    robert redford zz 231226 08 d7804c
    Robert Redford (left) and Demi Moore (right) in “Indecent Proposal.” © Paramount Pictures / Getty Images

    In later years, Redford scaled back acting, with notable roles in “Captain America: The Winter Soldier” (2014) and “Avengers: Endgame” (2019) as the villainous Alexander Pierce—ironic given his anti-establishment roots. His final film, “The Old Man & the Gun” (2018), capped a career that spanned over 50 years. He received honorary Oscars in 2002, the Presidential Medal of Freedom from Barack Obama in 2016, and international accolades like the Légion d’Honneur.

    Redford was married twice: first to Lola Van Wagenen (1958-1985), with whom he had four children (two of whom predeceased him), and then to artist Sibylle Szaggars in 2009. He is survived by Szaggars, two children, and grandchildren.

    3869
    Redford in his final major film role in The Old Man & the Gun in 2018. © Eric Zachanowich/AP

    As Hollywood faces streaming disruptions and cultural reckonings, Redford’s death prompts reflection on a time when stars like him drove genuine box office success through talent and innovation, not just ideology. His Sundance legacy endures as a beacon for free-market creativity in film.

  • US Workers Fired for Social Media Posts Mocking Charlie Kirk’s Assassination

    US Workers Fired for Social Media Posts Mocking Charlie Kirk’s Assassination

    6XLFJBEJ7BBN3A2S57BPYEDBCU
    Hundreds gathered at the Michigan State Capitol Building on Monday, Sept. 15, 2025, to memorialize the life of Charlie Kirk. Kirk was a conservative influencer who was shot and killed during an event on Sept. 11 at Utah Valley University. ©  Devin Anderson-Torrez | MLive.com

    The swift hammer of accountability is falling hard on left-wing radicals who dared to celebrate the cold-blooded assassination of Charlie Kirk, as dozens of American workers—from pilots and teachers to media hacks and corporate drones—face the consequences of their vile social media rants. In a nation reeling from the murder of the 31-year-old conservative icon, employers are finally drawing a line in the sand against the toxic hatred that fueled Tyler James Robinson’s execution-style shooting of Kirk last Wednesday at Utah Valley University.

    This isn’t cancel culture run amok; it’s righteous pushback against an assassination culture cultivated by the left, and it’s reshaping workplaces by forcing bosses to choose between decency and defending the indefensible.

    Kirk, the dynamic co-founder of Turning Point USA and a relentless warrior for American exceptionalism, youth empowerment, and traditional values, was gunned down mid-sentence during his “American Comeback Tour” in Orem, Utah. The graphic video of the attack—Robinson firing point-blank while Kirk discussed mass shootings—spread like wildfire, but so did the depraved glee from anti-conservative corners. Robinson’s manifesto, railing against “right-wing fascists,” exposed the deadly fruits of years of leftist incitement, from campus radicals to MSNBC echo chambers.

    President Trump, who lowered flags to half-staff and decried the “evil” behind the killing, has vowed to eradicate such threats, and the grassroots response is proving his America First spirit alive and kicking.

    The firings have been nothing short of a purge, triggered by a coordinated conservative campaign that’s doxxing these hatemongers and flooding their employers with evidence. A site called “Expose Charlie’s Murderers”—anonymously registered and boasting nearly 30,000 submissions by Saturday—has become the digital guillotine, archiving posts that revel in Kirk’s death as a “victory” or quip that he “spoke his fate into existence.” Though the site went dark Monday, its impact lingers, with Canadian journalist Rachel Gilmore publicly terrified of “far-right fans” after her neutral post drew threats— a stark reminder that even mild criticism now invites scrutiny in this post-assassination climate.

    Far from vigilantism, this is community justice against those who normalized violence against conservatives, a far cry from the unchecked leftist mobs that targeted Trump supporters for years.

    Aviation took the first hits, with Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy blasting American Airlines pilots “caught celebrating” the murder. “Immediately grounded and removed from service,” Duffy posted, demanding firings because “glorifying political violence is COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE!” American Airlines confirmed it had “initiated action,” stressing that “hate-related or hostile behavior runs contrary to our purpose.” Delta Air Lines suspended multiple employees for posts “well beyond healthy, respectful debate,” with the carrier warning that social media breaches could end careers.

    Microsoft, under fire from Tesla CEO Elon Musk for Blizzard employees “trashing” Kirk, announced Friday it’s reviewing “negative remarks” by staff, a nod to the tech giant’s need to clean house amid conservative pressure.

    Schools and universities, long bastions of leftist indoctrination, are crumbling under the weight of their own hypocrisy. Republican Sen. Marsha Blackburn called out a Middle Tennessee State University staffer for her “ZERO sympathy” post, leading to an “effective immediately” termination.

    GOP Rep. Nancy Mace targeted a South Carolina public school teacher, who was quietly shown the door by her district. Idaho’s West Ada School District fired an employee over an “inappropriate video,” vowing to “address harmful actions thoughtfully.” In Oregon, a middle school science teacher resigned after boasting on Facebook that Kirk’s death “brightened up” his day. Clemson University suspended a worker pending investigation for undisclosed posts, while nationwide, over a dozen educators—from California to New York—have been axed or sidelined for gloating like “Another one bites the dust.”

    Healthcare providers aren’t sparing the rod either. The University of Miami Health System canned an employee for “unacceptable public commentary,” affirming that while “freedom of speech is a fundamental right,” endorsements of violence violate core values.

    Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta fired a staffer for “inappropriate comments,” declaring such rhetoric a breach of social media policy. Even law firm Perkins Coie—infamous for its ties to George Soros and anti-Trump ops—booted a lawyer for Kirk-bashing posts, as reported by the Wall Street Journal.

    Media and entertainment faced their own reckonings. MSNBC’s Matthew Dowd was unceremoniously dumped after implying on-air that Kirk’s “awful words” invited “awful actions.” Network president Rebecca Kutler labeled it “inappropriate, insensitive, and unacceptable,” despite Dowd’s whiny Substack defense claiming a “right-wing media mob” forced the decision. DC Comics yanked its new “Red Hood” series after author Gretch Felker-Martin snarked, “Hope the bullet’s OK,” in deleted tweets—a rare win against Hollywood’s woke brigade.

    msnbc political analyst matthew dowd 111113824 9b7f34
    MSNBC political analyst Matthew Dowd was fired after making “insensitive” comments on Kirk’s death. © MSNBC

    Corporate cleanups abound: Nasdaq fired a staffer for posts “condoning or celebrating violence.” Office Depot terminated a Michigan employee who refused to print Kirk flyers, calling it “completely unacceptable.” The Carolina Panthers axed a PR flack for his remarks, insisting employee views don’t reflect the team. Freddy’s Frozen Custard & Steakburgers condemned a worker’s Satanic Temple donation plea and “Another one bites the dust” post, confirming the individual is gone. As one HR consultant told NPR, “This is very different from past political controversies at work”—no more kid gloves for anti-conservative venom while right-leaners got the boot.

    This wave of terminations—over 50 confirmed cases and counting—is a seismic shift, proving that in Trump’s resurgent America, tolerance for leftist assassination cheerleading has zero runway. The left’s cries of “doxxing” and “retaliation” ring hollow after years of silencing conservatives; now, the mob they unleashed is turning inward. Kirk’s legacy endures not just in policy but in this cultural firewall against hate. Employers who act aren’t caving—they’re leading, ensuring workplaces prioritize patriotism over poison.

  • Promoters Cancel Bob Vylan Concert Over Remarks on Charlie Kirk Assassination

    Promoters Cancel Bob Vylan Concert Over Remarks on Charlie Kirk Assassination

    A Bob Vylan concert in the Netherlands has been cancelled after comments made by the performer on stage about the assassination of Donald Trump ally Charlie Kirk.

    A member of the outspoken punk duo, who caused controversy when they chanted for the “death” of the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) at Glastonbury Festival, told the audience “if you chat shit you will get banged” in footage widely shared on social media.

    In response, their planned performance on Tuesday September 16 at the 013 in Tilburg has been cancelled, with the venue saying the statements made by the performer “go too far”.

    d987214281064aa2d9cf1410bff64df1Y29udGVudHNlYXJjaGFwaSwxNzU3OTY0MjA1 2.80839099

    During their performance at Amsterdam’s Paradiso on Saturday, frontman Bobby Vylan, whose real name is reportedly Pascal Robinson-Foster, told fans: “I want to dedicate this next one to an absolute piece of shit of a human being.

    “The pronouns was/were. Cause if you chat shit you will get banged. Rest in peace Charlie Kirk, you piece of shit.”

    Mr Kirk, who was a prominent political commentator in the US and ally of the president, was shot and killed at a Utah Valley University event on Wednesday, in what authorities called a political assassination.

    Hundreds of people attended a vigil for Mr Kirk in central London on Saturday with speakers hailing him as a “Christian martyr” and calling for people to wage a “war on evil”.

    A translated statement on the 013 website on Sunday said: “The planned performance by British rap-punk group Bob Vylan on Tuesday, September 16th, at Poppodium 013 in Tilburg has been cancelled.

    “The reason for the cancellation is the controversial statements the artist made last night during a show at Paradiso in Amsterdam.

    “Despite the controversy that arose after their Glastonbury performance, 013 decided to let Bob Vylan perform in Tilburg.”

    The venue said it had an “understanding for the artist’s anger” regarding the violence in Israel and said the duo clarified in a statement that the “death to the IDF” chant was “not an antisemitic slogan, but rather criticism of the Israeli army”.

    8caab1d79d164e3b0c5704d294efe8daY29udGVudHNlYXJjaGFwaSwxNzU3OTcwMTUz 2.81593482

    The statement added: “While we understand that these statements were made in the context of punk and activism, and that the reporting on them is sometimes less nuanced than what actually happened, we still believe these new statements go too far. They no longer fall within the scope of what we can offer a platform.”

    In a statement on its website, Club Paradiso said: “On Saturday September 13, during his performance at Paradiso, artist Bob Vylan made statements that many experienced as harsh and offensive.

    “Paradiso believes in the power of artistic freedom. Music, and punk in particular, has traditionally been a form of art that amplifies anger, discontent, and injustice without filter.

    “In a world on fire, artists sometimes choose language that sounds confrontational or violent. That is part of artistic expression, but not automatically language that we as a venue endorse.

    “Paradiso shares the outrage and concern regarding the genocidal violence taking place in Gaza.

    “That Bob Vylan raises his voice against it is legitimate and necessary. Should the Openbaar Ministerie (public prosecution service) wish to investigate whether any criminal offences have been committed, Paradiso will cooperate.”

    After reports that his comments “celebrated” Mr Kirk’s death, Bobby Vylan said in an Instagram video: “At no point during yesterday’s show was Charlie Kirk’s death celebrated. At no point whatsoever did we celebrate Charlie Kirk’s death.”

    The duo, comprised of frontman Bobby Vylan and drummer Bobbie Vylan, have another gig in the Netherlands at Doornroosje which is billed for Monday.

    A translated statement on the Doornroosje website, which appears to have been online prior to the recent comments, said: “Bob Vylan plays at Doornroosje because he’s an act that fits within our programming. The band has previously been booked for Doornroosje and played at the Valkhof Festival.”

    Following Bobby Vylan’s comments about the IDF at Glastonbury in June, Avon and Somerset Police launched an investigation.

    Earlier in the month, BBC director general Tim Davie said the corporation’s decision to broadcast Bob Vylan’s set live was “a very significant mistake”.

    While facing questions from MPs on the Culture, Media and Sport Committee on Tuesday, Davie said the punk duo’s set was “antisemitic” and “deeply disturbing”.

    The corporation issued an apology after the Bob Vylan set at Glastonbury, saying: “We deeply regret that such offensive and deplorable behaviour appeared on the BBC and want to apologise to our viewers and listeners and in particular the Jewish community.”

    Bobby Vylan said in a social media post that “there was nothing antisemitic or criminal about anything I said at Glastonbury”.

  • Amy Coney Barrett Says Charlie Kirk’s Death Highlights Importance of Kindness

    Amy Coney Barrett Says Charlie Kirk’s Death Highlights Importance of Kindness

    image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimg.theepochtimes.com%2Fassets%2Fuploads%2F2024%2F09%2F28%2Fid5731943 barrett 1 OP
    Judge Amy Coney Barrett in Washington on Oct. 1, 2020. © Erin Scott-Pool/Getty Images

    Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett said the assassination of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk is a tragic reminder of why Americans must find ways to settle disagreements through civil discourse rather than violence.

    Barrett made the remarks on Sept. 12 during an appearance at the University of Notre Dame in Indiana, where she was promoting her new book, “Listening to the Law: Reflections on the Court and Constitution.”

    Asked about the killing at the start of the event, she urged students to model a better way of engaging across political divides.

    Asked by the moderator to comment on Kirk’s killing, which took place on Sept. 10 in Utah, Barrett said it’s important to have disagreements in “a civil and collegial way.”

    “Too often when I look around the country—I mean political violence is the most grotesque symptom of it, but there are others, too, just in online conversations and the way that people treat those with whom they disagree,” Barrett said.

    “And that’s actually one of the points that I tried to make in the book. It’s just not a way to run a society.”

    “You can have a spirited debate without tearing somebody down,” she added during the Q&A portion of the event.

    Barrett briefly acknowledged her own security concerns, saying she felt safe under round-the-clock protection.

    “I’m in very good hands,” she said.

    Security for Supreme Court justices has drawn heightened attention since 2022, when a man was arrested near Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s home and charged with attempting to assassinate him.

    A Nation on Edge

    Just hours before Barrett’s appearance, Charlie Kirk’s widow, Erika, delivered an emotional message during a livestream on Turning Point USA’s YouTube channel. It was her first public appearance since her husband’s assassination two days earlier.

    “The evil-doers for my husband’s assassination have no idea what they have done,” she said.

    “The cries of this widow will echo around the world like a battle cry.”

    Vowing to continue her husband’s work, she said the movement he launched as a high school project and turned into a national campus force would not be silenced.

    Kirk, a prominent conservative activist and founder of Turning Point USA, was fatally shot while speaking at Utah Valley University.

    Known for his “prove me wrong” campus debates and emphasis on engaging young voters, the 31-year-old was just minutes into his latest campus tour stop when a gunshot ended his life.

    Authorities later announced the arrest of 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, who was detained on suspicion of aggravated murder and related charges.

    Utah Gov. Spencer Cox said investigators recovered a Mauser 98 .30-06 bolt-action rifle with a scope, allegedly used in the attack. Bullet casings at the scene carried engraved messages, some with anti-fascist slogans and others referencing taunting internet memes, according to authorities.

    One casing allegedly read “Hey fascist! Catch!” followed by directional arrow symbols resembling a video game code. Another bullet allegedly carried lyrics from the World War II-era Italian anti-fascist song “Bella Ciao.”

    Cox said the suspect had become “more political in recent years” and had discussed Kirk with family, saying he disliked him for “spreading hate.”

    Kirk’s killing has intensified concerns that the country may be entering a new era of political violence.

    Susan MacManus, a veteran Florida political analyst, told The NY Budgets that the tragedy could be a catalyst for change—but only if lawmakers use it to recommit to civility.

    “But is it going to be a catalyst for the two parties coming together and saying, ‘Enough of this’?” she asked.

    “Or is it just going to be a catalyst for even further deepening the polarization in this country?”