Tag: Tesla Inc.

  • Elon Musk Wins Shareholder Approval for Tesla’s Historic $1 Trillion Pay Package

    Elon Musk Wins Shareholder Approval for Tesla’s Historic $1 Trillion Pay Package

    Elon Musk speaking at the 2025 Tesla shareholder meeting. ·© Tesla.com
    Stock Widget

    Tesla TSLA -2.85% ▼ shareholders approved a record-setting pay package for Chief Executive Elon Musk, a plan designed to motivate the world’s richest man with as much as $1 trillion in additional stock.

    Flanked by dancing humanoid robots on a stage bathed in pink and blue light at the electric-vehicle maker’s Austin, Texas, headquarters, Musk thanked the crowd of shareholders who supported the pay package with more than 75% of the votes cast.

    “What we’re about to embark upon is not merely a new chapter of the future of Tesla but a whole new book,” Musk said. “I guess what I’m saying is hang onto your Tesla stock,” he added later.

    The measure was hotly debated, with some large shareholders taking opposing sides. The voting was largely seen as a referendum on the company’s longtime leader and his vision to shift Tesla’s focus to humanoid robots and artificial intelligence.

    Musk, who is also CEO of SpaceX and xAI, had threatened on social media to leave Tesla if the measure had been rejected. He is already Tesla’s biggest shareholder, with a roughly 15% stake.

    Musk had said he wanted a big enough ownership stake in Tesla to be comfortable that the “robot army” he was developing didn’t fall into the wrong hands, but not so large that he couldn’t be fired if he went “crazy.”

    On another proposal that would authorize the Tesla board to invest in Musk’s artificial-intelligence company, xAI, Tesla General Counsel Brandon Ehrhart said more shares had been voted for the proposal than against, but there were many abstentions. He said the board would consider its next steps.

    Musk had publicly endorsed the idea as he seeks to catch up in the AI race.

    The new pay package, which includes 12 chunks of stock, could give Musk control over as much as 25% of Tesla if he hits a series of milestones and expands the company’s market capitalization to $8.5 trillion over the next 10 years. Its market cap is now around $1.5 trillion.

    Tesla’s board described the package as pay for performance, designed to motivate Musk to transform the company with new products such as autonomous vehicles, robotaxis and humanoid robots.

    “Having worked with him now for 11 years, I can say what motivates him is doing things that others can’t do or haven’t been able to do,” Tesla Chair Robyn Denholm said in an interview last week.

    Tesla struggled to keep Musk’s attention earlier this year as he spent time in Washington running the Department of Government Efficiency. Tesla’s vehicle sales fell more than 13% in the first half of the year. After Musk left Washington in May, he turned his focus to his startup xAI and the development of its chatbot Grok, The Wall Street Journal reported.

    The new pay package was opposed by several proxy advisers and institutional investors including the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, various New York City retirement systems, and Norges Bank Investment Management, which is the sixth-largest institutional shareholder with a 1.2% stake.

    Institutional Shareholder Services, one of the proxy advisers that urged passive funds to vote down the compensation package, said it had concerns about the magnitude and design of the “astronomical” stock award.

    Charles Schwab, which has a Tesla stake of about 0.6%, said Tuesday it would vote in favor of the package. “We firmly believe that supporting this proposal aligns both management and shareholder interests,” it said in a statement.

    Huge stock awards tied to ambitious targets—sometimes called “moonshot” pay packages—are cast by proponents as a high-octane incentive for outstanding performance. Critics say they are often doubly flawed: overly expensive if targets prove easier than predicted; and counterproductive if the targets become unattainable and executives see little reason to stick around.

    Musk’s new package is divided into 12 tranches. He could reach the first tranche if Tesla’s market cap grows to $2 trillion from around $1.5 trillion today, combined with an operational goal such as selling 11.5 million new vehicles, on top of the 8.5 million vehicles on the road.

    More challenging milestones include selling one million robots to paying customers and maintaining an adjusted Ebitda of $400 billion. Last year, Tesla posted an adjusted Ebitda of $16 billion.

    For each tranche he unlocks, Musk would receive equity equivalent to about 1% of Tesla’s current shares. Once he earns a tranche, he could vote those shares but wouldn’t be able to sell them until they vest, in either 7.5 years or 10 years.

    Musk’s 2018 pay package, the most valuable on record before the 2025 package, is tied up in a dispute at the Delaware Supreme Court. Tesla is appealing a lower-court decision to rescind the 2018 pay package after a judge ruled in January 2024 that Tesla’s directors were beholden to Musk and the approval process for that package was tainted and lacked transparency.

    Here is a breakdown of Musk’s current Tesla ownership:

  • US Workers Fired for Social Media Posts Mocking Charlie Kirk’s Assassination

    US Workers Fired for Social Media Posts Mocking Charlie Kirk’s Assassination

    Hundreds gathered at the Michigan State Capitol Building on Monday, Sept. 15, 2025, to memorialize the life of Charlie Kirk. Kirk was a conservative influencer who was shot and killed during an event on Sept. 11 at Utah Valley University. ©  Devin Anderson-Torrez | MLive.com

    The swift hammer of accountability is falling hard on left-wing radicals who dared to celebrate the cold-blooded assassination of Charlie Kirk, as dozens of American workers—from pilots and teachers to media hacks and corporate drones—face the consequences of their vile social media rants. In a nation reeling from the murder of the 31-year-old conservative icon, employers are finally drawing a line in the sand against the toxic hatred that fueled Tyler James Robinson’s execution-style shooting of Kirk last Wednesday at Utah Valley University.

    This isn’t cancel culture run amok; it’s righteous pushback against an assassination culture cultivated by the left, and it’s reshaping workplaces by forcing bosses to choose between decency and defending the indefensible.

    Kirk, the dynamic co-founder of Turning Point USA and a relentless warrior for American exceptionalism, youth empowerment, and traditional values, was gunned down mid-sentence during his “American Comeback Tour” in Orem, Utah. The graphic video of the attack—Robinson firing point-blank while Kirk discussed mass shootings—spread like wildfire, but so did the depraved glee from anti-conservative corners. Robinson’s manifesto, railing against “right-wing fascists,” exposed the deadly fruits of years of leftist incitement, from campus radicals to MSNBC echo chambers.

    President Trump, who lowered flags to half-staff and decried the “evil” behind the killing, has vowed to eradicate such threats, and the grassroots response is proving his America First spirit alive and kicking.

    The firings have been nothing short of a purge, triggered by a coordinated conservative campaign that’s doxxing these hatemongers and flooding their employers with evidence. A site called “Expose Charlie’s Murderers”—anonymously registered and boasting nearly 30,000 submissions by Saturday—has become the digital guillotine, archiving posts that revel in Kirk’s death as a “victory” or quip that he “spoke his fate into existence.” Though the site went dark Monday, its impact lingers, with Canadian journalist Rachel Gilmore publicly terrified of “far-right fans” after her neutral post drew threats— a stark reminder that even mild criticism now invites scrutiny in this post-assassination climate.

    Far from vigilantism, this is community justice against those who normalized violence against conservatives, a far cry from the unchecked leftist mobs that targeted Trump supporters for years.

    Aviation took the first hits, with Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy blasting American Airlines pilots “caught celebrating” the murder. “Immediately grounded and removed from service,” Duffy posted, demanding firings because “glorifying political violence is COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE!” American Airlines confirmed it had “initiated action,” stressing that “hate-related or hostile behavior runs contrary to our purpose.” Delta Air Lines suspended multiple employees for posts “well beyond healthy, respectful debate,” with the carrier warning that social media breaches could end careers.

    Microsoft, under fire from Tesla CEO Elon Musk for Blizzard employees “trashing” Kirk, announced Friday it’s reviewing “negative remarks” by staff, a nod to the tech giant’s need to clean house amid conservative pressure.

    Schools and universities, long bastions of leftist indoctrination, are crumbling under the weight of their own hypocrisy. Republican Sen. Marsha Blackburn called out a Middle Tennessee State University staffer for her “ZERO sympathy” post, leading to an “effective immediately” termination.

    GOP Rep. Nancy Mace targeted a South Carolina public school teacher, who was quietly shown the door by her district. Idaho’s West Ada School District fired an employee over an “inappropriate video,” vowing to “address harmful actions thoughtfully.” In Oregon, a middle school science teacher resigned after boasting on Facebook that Kirk’s death “brightened up” his day. Clemson University suspended a worker pending investigation for undisclosed posts, while nationwide, over a dozen educators—from California to New York—have been axed or sidelined for gloating like “Another one bites the dust.”

    Healthcare providers aren’t sparing the rod either. The University of Miami Health System canned an employee for “unacceptable public commentary,” affirming that while “freedom of speech is a fundamental right,” endorsements of violence violate core values.

    Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta fired a staffer for “inappropriate comments,” declaring such rhetoric a breach of social media policy. Even law firm Perkins Coie—infamous for its ties to George Soros and anti-Trump ops—booted a lawyer for Kirk-bashing posts, as reported by the Wall Street Journal.

    Media and entertainment faced their own reckonings. MSNBC’s Matthew Dowd was unceremoniously dumped after implying on-air that Kirk’s “awful words” invited “awful actions.” Network president Rebecca Kutler labeled it “inappropriate, insensitive, and unacceptable,” despite Dowd’s whiny Substack defense claiming a “right-wing media mob” forced the decision. DC Comics yanked its new “Red Hood” series after author Gretch Felker-Martin snarked, “Hope the bullet’s OK,” in deleted tweets—a rare win against Hollywood’s woke brigade.

    MSNBC political analyst Matthew Dowd was fired after making “insensitive” comments on Kirk’s death. © MSNBC

    Corporate cleanups abound: Nasdaq fired a staffer for posts “condoning or celebrating violence.” Office Depot terminated a Michigan employee who refused to print Kirk flyers, calling it “completely unacceptable.” The Carolina Panthers axed a PR flack for his remarks, insisting employee views don’t reflect the team. Freddy’s Frozen Custard & Steakburgers condemned a worker’s Satanic Temple donation plea and “Another one bites the dust” post, confirming the individual is gone. As one HR consultant told NPR, “This is very different from past political controversies at work”—no more kid gloves for anti-conservative venom while right-leaners got the boot.

    This wave of terminations—over 50 confirmed cases and counting—is a seismic shift, proving that in Trump’s resurgent America, tolerance for leftist assassination cheerleading has zero runway. The left’s cries of “doxxing” and “retaliation” ring hollow after years of silencing conservatives; now, the mob they unleashed is turning inward. Kirk’s legacy endures not just in policy but in this cultural firewall against hate. Employers who act aren’t caving—they’re leading, ensuring workplaces prioritize patriotism over poison.

  • Former Tesla Executive Takes Aim at Musk’s Management Style

    Former Tesla Executive Takes Aim at Musk’s Management Style

    Stock Widget

    Tesla’s TSLA -4.75% ▼ 2025 has been forgettable, to say the least.

    Deliveries dropped hard in Q2, tanking nearly 14% year-over-year, marking Tesla’s worst quarterly sales drop in over a decade. 

    Also, the U.S. EV market share dropped to 38% in August, the first time it has fallen below 40% since 2017, with legacy automakers and new players closing in.

    Moreover, the stock has been on a rollercoaster.

    After its market cap peaked near $1.24 trillion in February, Tesla’s market cap plunged to $916 billion by March, erasing a whopping $300 billion in value before clawing back. Also, shares remain flat year-to-date, lagging broader market gains in the tech space.

    Then there’s the incredible reputational damage. Political firestorms, product delays, and a stream of high-level exits continue to test investor patience.

    2025 Tesla Cybertruck. © Greg Pajo|Car/Driver

    Now, another senior executive is out, and his exit has been far from quiet. His blunt criticism of leadership sharpens concerns that Tesla’s challenges aren’t just cyclical, but also structural.

    Senior engineer’s exit adds to Tesla leadership strain

    Tesla’s leadership churn just had another spotlight moment.

    Senior engineer Giorgio Balestrieri, who joined the EV pioneer in 2017 and was involved in its Autobidder energy-trading platform, announced his departure on LinkedIn this week, putting Elon Musk squarely at the center of it.

    Balestrieri wrote on LinkedIn:

    “All this being said, I do need to address the elephant in the room: The main reason I’m leaving is that I think Elon has dealt huge damage to Tesla’s mission (and to the health of democratic institutions in several countries).

    “Beyond that, Elon’s leadership and decision making seem seriously compromised. Given his huge (and growing, inexplicably) stake in Tesla, I can’t convince myself anymore that this is the right place to be.”

    For context, after his stake dipped to 12.7% to 13% post-Twitter sales, Tesla’s August stock award of a whopping $29 billion could lift his holding to over 15%. 

    Additionally, the board also floated a “$1 trillion” performance package, which could potentially boost his voting power toward 25% over time.

    Tesla’s stock has weathered a ton of criticism from Musk, but steady departures of long-tenured engineers raise a ton of questions for investors. 

    Leadership credibility matters critically in advanced energy platforms, and when insiders question it, the cost of capital and talent retention become major long-term issues.

    More exits pile up as the Tesla brand takes a hit

    The Balestrieri departure isn’t an isolated event.

    Over the past year, we’ve seen at least eight senior leaders walk, spanning sales, software, robotics, and service. 

    Some of the recent high-profile exits over the past 12 months include:

    • Troy Jones, VP sales/service/delivery (North America): Left July 15, 2025
    • Piero Landolfi, director of service (North America): Departed Aug. 11, 2025
    • Omead Afshar, head of sales & manufacturing (NA/EU): Exited late June 2025
    • Milan Kovac, head of Optimus (humanoid robot): Announced his exit on June 6, 2025
    • David Lau, VP of software engineering: Stepped down in April 2025

    Also notable in 2025 were key exits of personnel such as Vineet Mehta in batteries, David Imai in design, and Pete Bannon, who led Tesla’s Dojo supercomputer project.

    These developments should be troubling for Tesla investors, as this isn’t just about swapping nameplates. It involves losing institutional memory across sales, service, and next-gen platforms.

    In markets where talent and trust are paramount, frequent senior departures slow recruiting flywheels, denting a company’s reputation in the process. 

    These effects rarely show up in a single quarter, but are likely to compound over time in valuation multiples.

  • Elon Musk’s ‘retro-futuristic’ Tesla Diner opens in Hollywood, featuring Optimus robots and Cybertruck-themed food boxes

    Elon Musk’s ‘retro-futuristic’ Tesla Diner opens in Hollywood, featuring Optimus robots and Cybertruck-themed food boxes

    Elon Musk’s Optimus robots greeted hungry fans as the mogul’s long-awaited Tesla Diner finally opened its “retro-futuristic” doors along the famed Hollywood strip. 

    The all-night drive-in offers “80 V4 Supercharger stalls” and two giant entertainment screens — where Tesla’s humanoid Optimus robots handed out popcorn to customers who showed up for Monday’s debut.

    The location opened up for orders at 4:20 p.m. local time Monday – Musk’s favorite marijuana-themed reference.

    People wait in line during the opening of the Tesla Diner and Drive-In restaurant and Supercharger on Santa Monica Blvd in the Hollywood neighborhood Los Angeles, California on July 21, 2025. © AFP via Getty Images

    The Tesla CEO shared a number of posts touting the Tesla Diner’s features and urged customers to “try it out.”

    “Aiming to be a fun experience for all, whether Tesla owners or not. Will keep improving,” Musk wrote on X.

    The menu features a number of classic options with locally sourced ingredients, including fried chicken and waffles, a Tesla burger and a Diner club sandwich.

    Some diners received their food in “Cybertruck”-themed boxes resembling Tesla’s stainless steel pickup trick. Cups and cartons of fries featured a distinctive Tesla lightning bolt logo.

    If the original diner concept is successful, Musk said in separate post that Tesla would “establish these in major cities around the world, as well as Supercharger sites on long distance routes.”

    Musk has teased his diner concept online for several years.

    Tesla Cybertruck food boxes were given to customers. © AFP via Getty Images
    Tesla Cybertruck food boxes were given to customers. © AFP/Getty Images
    Tesla’s Optimus robots greeted customers and handed out popcorn. © Tesla Club- SoCal / SWNS

    In 2023, Tesla gained approval to move forward with construction on Santa Monica Blvd.

    Customers are able to watch movies on the diner’s giant screens or in their own vehicles by accessing the Tesla diner app.

    Tesla shares were up about 1% in trading Tuesday.

    Musk has refocused his efforts on Tesla after stepping back from President Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency.

    The Tesla Diner was described as a retrofuturistic experience. © ZUMAPRESS.com

    The two had a public falling-out over the president’s “Big Beautiful Bill,” with Musk even declaring plans to launch his own political party.

    Meanwhile, Tesla is looking to reverse a recent vehicle sales slump.

    Musk has touted the long-term prospects of the company’s technology, especially its Optimus robots and self-driving Robotaxi fleet, which recently debuted in Austin, Texas.

  • Tesla Set to Launch in India With Planned Showroom Opening

    Tesla Set to Launch in India With Planned Showroom Opening

    Tesla Inc. TSLA –.–%

    Mumbai, India – Tesla Inc. is set to make its long-awaited debut in India next week, officially entering the world’s third-largest automobile market with the opening of its first showroom in Mumbai.

    The U.S. electric vehicle (EV) pioneer will unveil its new Tesla Experience Center on July 15, located at the upscale Maker Maxity Mall in the Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC), Mumbai’s premier business district. According to an event invitation obtained by The NY Budgets, the launch event will run for approximately 90 minutes, marking a significant milestone for the company and Indian EV enthusiasts alike.

    The new Experience Center will showcase Tesla’s flagship EVs, including the Model 3 and Model Y, and serve as a hub for direct sales, test drives, and customer engagement. Tesla is expected to begin direct sales in India immediately following the launch, offering a fully digital ordering process through its official website and showroom network.

    This is Tesla’s first official presence in India after years of anticipation, regulatory hurdles, and discussions about tariffs and factory investments.

    Tesla CEO Elon Musk has long expressed interest in the Indian market. The company’s momentum picked up after a high-profile virtual meeting between Musk and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in April. The two reportedly discussed cooperation in technology, renewable energy, and innovation.

    During the same month, Tesla’s Chief Financial Officer noted the company had been “very careful” in timing its India entry, signaling strategic caution given India’s complex regulatory and competitive landscape.

    Despite India’s population of over 1.4 billion and growing middle class, EV adoption has been slow due to infrastructure challenges, high upfront costs, and limited availability of premium EVs.

    Tesla will not manufacture locally in India, at least initially. Vehicles sold in India will be imported from its Shanghai Gigafactory in China and the Gigafactory Berlin-Brandenburg in Germany. This means Indian buyers may face import duties of up to 70%, making Tesla’s cars significantly more expensive compared to domestic EVs.

    India has offered incentives to reduce the import duty to 15% — but only for companies that invest $500 million or more in local manufacturing. However, according to Indian Minister of Heavy Industries, H.D. Kumaraswamy, Tesla currently has “no interest” in setting up a local plant.

    This stance may evolve if demand in India proves strong enough to justify local assembly or a full-scale Gigafactory.

    Tesla’s entry into India will put it in direct competition with major players in the local EV scene:

    BYD (Build Your Dreams), the Chinese EV giant, already operates in India with its Atto 3 electric SUV and E6 MPV. Tata Motors, a dominant domestic automaker, leads the Indian EV market with its affordable and widely accepted models like the Nexon EV and Tigor EV. Mahindra Electric and MG Motor India are also expanding their EV portfolios aggressively.

    While Tesla brings brand prestige and advanced software like Autopilot, its premium pricing may be a hurdle in a price-sensitive market.

    Tesla is already staffing up in India. According to LinkedIn job postings, Tesla is hiring in Mumbai for positions such as:

    India’s EV market is growing rapidly. According to industry estimates, EV sales in India surged 160% year-over-year in 2024, reaching over 1.5 million units. However, premium EVs make up less than 5% of total EV sales, indicating Tesla will initially be playing to a niche demographic.

    Still, India’s push for clean energy, rapid urbanization, and growing affluence in metro cities make it a potentially lucrative long-term market. Government-backed incentives under the FAME II scheme (Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Electric Vehicles in India) have also been expanded to encourage adoption.

    If Tesla successfully navigates India’s tariff structure, infrastructure limitations, and price sensitivity, it could unlock a vast market with significant upside in the coming years.

  • Longtime Musk Aide and “Fixer” Omead Afshar Departs Tesla Amid Sales Slump

    Longtime Musk Aide and “Fixer” Omead Afshar Departs Tesla Amid Sales Slump

    Omead Afshar, a veteran Tesla executive long known as Elon Musk’s personal “fixer,” has quietly exited the company, marking a notable shift in the automaker’s leadership structure.

    Afshar—who joined Tesla in 2017 and rose to prominence by overseeing the Texas Gigafactory construction and serving in the Office of the CEO—had recently been appointed vice president of sales and manufacturing for North America and Europe back in October 2024. However, he has now left amid one of the most challenging periods in Tesla’s recent history: global vehicle deliveries fell by 13% in Q1 2025, European deliveries plunged ~40% in May, and profitability dropped sharply by 71%.

    According to reports, Afshar’s name disappeared from Tesla’s internal directory, and he has ceased all corporate communication channels. The Wall Street Journal and Reuters attribute his departure to the broader struggles Tesla is facing—especially increased competition from Chinese EV makers and scrutiny over Elon Musk’s political entanglements. His exit aligns with other high-profile resignations, including that of North America HR head Jenna Ferrua and Milan Kovac, former VP of Optimus robotics.

    Notably, his departure comes just days after he posted praise for the Austin robotaxi pilot on X: “Absolutely historic day for Tesla… Thank you, Elon, for pushing us all!” .

    Tesla shares, which have fallen roughly 19% year‑to‑date, saw a brief dip following news of Afshar’s exit but stabilized shortly thereafter. Analysts say the move is likely meant to reassure investors that Tesla’s board is taking concrete action to arrest the operational slide.

    Second-quarter delivery results, due next week, will be under intense scrutiny. Equity analysts project a further 10% drop in deliveries—potentially to around 392,800 vehicles globally for Q2—compared to 443,956 units last year.

    Benchmark analyst remarks suggest longer-term confidence remains tied to Tesla’s ambitious pivot toward AI and autonomy, such as the robotaxi program and Optimus humanoid initiative—even as traditional sales sag.

    Tom Zhu, Tesla’s global automotive head, is expected to temporarily absorb Afshar’s duties for North America and Europe—he already heads the Asia‑Pacific operations, reported WSJ.

    Industry watchers view Afshar’s exit as part of a broader restructuring effort that aligns with Tesla’s shift toward AI and robotics.

    With aging legacy models and mounting competition from both Western and Chinese automakers, Tesla is under pressure to roll out new products or aggressive pricing to regain market share.

    Omead Afshar’s departure represents more than a personnel change—it reflects Tesla’s accelerating pivot away from conventional automotive dominance to a future defined by autonomy, robotics, and AI. Whether this signals a rejuvenation or further fragmentation remains to be seen. Q2 delivery results will be a key indicator.

  • Xiaomi’s stock price has reached new highs following a strong reception for its new electric vehicle, which is priced to compete aggressively with Tesla

    Xiaomi’s stock price has reached new highs following a strong reception for its new electric vehicle, which is priced to compete aggressively with Tesla

    Hong Kong-listed shares of China’s Xiaomi surged over 5% to hit a record high on Friday, a day after its electric car drew a strong response from customers.

    The consumer electronics company, a relatively newer player in the EV market, took aim straight at rival Tesla with its new electric luxury vehicle, YU7. The SUV’s pricing starts at 253,500 yuan ($35,322), CEO Lei Jun said Thursday, pointing out that the vehicle was 10,000 yuan cheaper than Tesla’s Model Y, which starts at 263,500 yuan in China.

    The YU7 received more than 200,000 orders within just three minutes of its launch, Xiaomi said.

    Prior to the official price announcement, a Citi report had listed expectations that the YU7 SUV would be priced around 250,000 yuan to 320,000 yuan ($34,800 to $44,590), forecasting monthly sales of about 30,000 units. Once the pace picks up, Citi predicts annual sales of 300,000 to 360,000 units.

    Xiaomi’s company’s SU7 sedan launched last year was also priced below Tesla’s Model 3.

    Lei on Thursday claimed the YU7 beat Tesla’s Model Y on a range of metrics, but still came short on driver assist. The YU7 comes with driver-assist software, the most advanced version of which is powered by Nvidia’s Thor chip. Pre-sales start at 10 p.m. on Thursday, with deliveries expected within one to five weeks.

    Xiaomi had initially said it would launch its YU7 in July. The earlier event takes place amid an intensifying electric car price war.

    Xiaomi revealed its YU7 SUV in late May, less than a year after launching its first electric car, and claimed the vehicle would have a driving range of at least 760 kilometers (472 miles) on a single charge.

    That’s well above the 719 kilometers advertised for Tesla’s extended-range Model Y. Driving range has been a selling point for consumers worried about frequent battery charging.

    While Xiaomi has not promoted its artificial intelligence as much as other consumer brands, Thursday’s launch event showcased several AI car features, such as allowing drivers to change a song using hand motions, or ask a phone app to describe where the car is parked.

    The YU7 also supports Apple Car Play and Apple Music, Lei said.

    The Chinese smartphone and home appliance company launched several other products on Thursday, including highly-anticipated artificial intelligence-connected glasses.

    The AI glasses, which rival Meta’s Ray Bans smart offering, can change the tint of the lenses and scan a QR code to make payments, mimicking China’s mobile smartphone apps. Xiaomi also announced similar features to those of the Meta glasses, such as being able to take photos and videos, as well as use interactive AI to identify a flower or translate text.

    Xiaomi’s AI glasses start at 1,999 yuan ($279). A Xiaomi spokesperson said there were currently no plans to sell the glasses overseas. Meta’s version isn’t officially sold in China.

  • Tesla’s Board Chairman Made $198 Million Selling Shares While Profit Dropped

    Tesla’s Board Chairman Made $198 Million Selling Shares While Profit Dropped

    In March, after a steep decline in Tesla’s share price, Elon Musk told employees, “Hang on to your stock.”

    The chair of Tesla’s board, Robyn Denholm, has not heeded his advice. Ms. Denholm has made $198 million in the past six months selling Tesla stock that she earned for serving on the board, according to a New York Times analysis of securities filings.

    That brings her total profit on the sale of Tesla stock to more than $530 million since becoming the board’s leader in late 2018, far more than her peers have made at the most valuable U.S. companies during that time, the analysis shows.

    The share sales raise questions about Ms. Denholm’s confidence in Tesla’s prospects. Her most recent sales, executed under a prearranged trading plan filed last summer, came as Mr. Musk, the company’s chief executive, took a time-consuming role in the Trump administration. Tesla’s car sales have plunged partly because Mr. Musk’s political activities have turned off some car buyers. The company’s quarterly profit fell in the first three months of 2025 to its lowest level in four years.

    Ms. Denholm earned the right to buy those shares, known as stock options, for serving on the board, a part-time position. Tesla granted the options between 2014 and 2020, and its share price has soared since then, giving Ms. Denholm the right to buy shares for a lot less than their current price. Last week, for example, she bought more than 112,000 shares for $24.73 apiece and sold them the same day for more than $270.

    Stock Sales Aligned With Surging Share Prices

    Robyn Denholm filed a stock sale plan soon after Elon Musk endorsed Donald Trump for president. The first sale came the week after Mr. Trump was elected.

    “To dump her stock, it doesn’t send a message that this is a board chair who is invested in the future of the company,” said the New York City comptroller, Brad Lander, who oversees the city’s five public pension funds. As of March, those funds held more than three million Tesla shares, valued at the time at roughly $817 million.

    A spokesman for Ms. Denholm said Tesla paid board members in a manner that was “completely aligned with shareholder interests.”

    “The reason the value of the Tesla directors’ options has increased is because Tesla has outperformed its industry peers and created outsized returns for the owners of the company, the shareholders,” he said in a statement.

    Stock options, which for years made up the bulk of Tesla directors’ compensation, are valuable only if the company’s share price rises, as Tesla’s did. Those who exercise their options to buy company stock can sell or hold on to their new shares.

    Ms. Denholm has sold more than 1.4 million Tesla shares and continues to hold 85,000 of them and roughly 49,000 stock options, according to the Times analysis. Equilar, a compensation research firm, reviewed the methodology. Her latest wave of stock sales were carried out under the plan she set into motion in July, soon after Mr. Musk endorsed Donald J. Trump for president.

    Under securities regulations, executives and other insiders can use such plans to trade shares in their companies. They are not required to disclose many details of their plans, including the reason for them or the conditions under which shares will be sold. They also have a lot of leeway to cancel the plans.

    A native of Australia and veteran technology executive, Ms. Denholm has maintained a low profile and rarely speaks publicly about Tesla or Mr. Musk. She was recruited to the Tesla board in 2014 and appointed chair in 2018 after Mr. Musk agreed to step down from the position under a settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    She and other board members have been criticized by some investors, activists and a Delaware judge for not serving as counterweights to Mr. Musk, who is widely seen as brash and impulsive. Tesla directors have also been faulted for failing to ensure that he remains focused on Tesla.

    “Musk operates as if free of board oversight,” Chancellor Kathaleen St. J. McCormick of the Delaware Court of Chancery wrote last year when she ruled in favor of a shareholder who had challenged Mr. Musk’s 2018 pay package, valued at around $56 billion. Judge McCormick, in that ruling, described Ms. Denholm’s style of overseeing Mr. Musk as “lackadaisical.”

    Tesla has appealed the decision, which voided Mr. Musk’s pay package, and Ms. Denholm has pushed back on Judge McCormick’s critique.

    “Anybody who knows me, knows that I am not lackadaisical, now that I know what that word means,” Ms. Denholm told The Financial Times last year. “It is probably the furthest from the truth. I am really intense and very diligent in what I do.”

    During the trial over Mr. Musk’s pay, Ms. Denholm described the money she had made from her Tesla board service as “life-changing.” Director pay at Tesla was subject to a separate lawsuit that Ms. Denholm and other board members settled in 2023.

    Mr. Musk, who has long been a part-time chief executive of Tesla, has taken on even more responsibilities over the years. He has become a regular presence in Washington, leading President Trump’s efforts to slash government spending and dismiss federal government employees.

    Mr. Musk said recently he would cut back his time in Washington to one or two days a week. His attention is likely to remain divided, however, because he also leads several other businesses, including SpaceX and X, the social media site he owns.

    Ms. Denholm’s first sales under her recent trading plan took place in November, the week after the presidential election, as Tesla’s share price was climbing. The stock reached a new high a few weeks later, in December. She continued to sell through early May, as the company faced consumer backlash over Mr. Musk’s political activities and the stock price fell.

    The stock is now down around 34 percent from its peak after recovering some of its losses over the last few weeks.

    Mr. Musk acknowledged Tesla’s difficulties during a meeting with company employees in March. “If you read the news it feels like, you know, Armageddon,” he said half-jokingly.

    He went on to advise workers not to sell their stock, saying Tesla would become the most valuable company in the world as it perfected self-driving taxis and robots that resembled and moved like humans. “The future is incredibly bright,” he said.

    Ms. Denholm’s sales have far outstripped those by other Tesla directors, with the exception of Mr. Musk, who remained on the board after stepping down as chair.

    She and other current and former Tesla board members agreed to settle a shareholder lawsuit over their pay in 2023, collectively agreeing to return compensation valued at $735 million. They denied wrongdoing. Stock options valued at more than $130 million were canceled on May 1 to satisfy Ms. Denholm’s obligations under that settlement, securities filings show.

    Board members agreed in June 2021, after that lawsuit was filed, to forgo new equity grants.

    Ms. Denholm also made more money selling her company’s stock than the leaders of other corporate boards during the same period. The Times reviewed stock sales by board chairs at the most valuable U.S. companies who, like Ms. Denholm, are not executives at those companies.

    The nonexecutive chair with the next-highest profit from selling shares in the company he oversees was Stephen Hemsley of UnitedHealth Group. Mr. Hemsley has earned more than $100 million from the sale of UnitedHealth shares since November 2018, though he received all of that stock while he was chief executive of the health care company.

    UnitedHealth Group confirmed the findings, but declined to comment. On Tuesday, the company announced that Mr. Hemsley would retake the chief executive job in addition to serving as chairman.

    Share sales by executives and directors often predict poor performance by the companies they lead, some academic research has found.

    Leaders like Ms. Denholm have access to nonpublic information and a deep understanding of how broader economic forces may affect company performance. That can make their trades especially profitable, according to Nejat Seyhun, a professor of finance at the University of Michigan.

    Insiders “set up plans when they have information,” Professor Seyhun said. If conditions change, “they can cancel those plans.”

  • Tesla Resolves Lawsuit from Black Worker Claiming Widespread Harassment

    Tesla Resolves Lawsuit from Black Worker Claiming Widespread Harassment

    Tesla has settled a racial discrimination lawsuit by a Black female employee who claimed a manager at its Fremont, California, plant sometimes greeted workers by saying “welcome to the plantation” or “welcome to the slave house.”

    Raina Pierce, who installed latches on car doors, and the automaker led by billionaire Elon Musk agreed to a settlement proposed by a mediator, according to a joint filing Thursday in San Francisco federal court.

    Terms were not disclosed, and both sides are finalizing a settlement agreement, the filing said.

    Lawyers for Pierce and Tesla did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Musk is not a defendant.

    Pierce said she was subjected to pervasive harassment, including a common racial slur she said was scrawled throughout the plant including in bathrooms, and a gender-based insult.

    She also said she was yelled at or disciplined for conduct for which non-Black workers were excused.

    Pierce’s complaint quotes a Tesla employee who temporarily joined her production line and said, “Ma’am, you need to go to HR because these leads are saying things about you that are not right.”

    Tesla has faced other accusations of racial discrimination and harassment at the Fremont plant.

    One plaintiff, elevator operator Owen Diaz, settled in March 2024 for undisclosed terms after a $3.2 million jury verdict. Another jury had awarded Diaz $137 million in 2021, but the case was retried after he rejected a lower sum the judge proposed.