In March, after a steep decline in Tesla’s share price, Elon Musk told employees, “Hang on to your stock.”
The chair of Tesla’s board, Robyn Denholm, has not heeded his advice. Ms. Denholm has made $198 million in the past six months selling Tesla stock that she earned for serving on the board, according to a New York Times analysis of securities filings.
That brings her total profit on the sale of Tesla stock to more than $530 million since becoming the board’s leader in late 2018, far more than her peers have made at the most valuable U.S. companies during that time, the analysis shows.
The share sales raise questions about Ms. Denholm’s confidence in Tesla’s prospects. Her most recent sales, executed under a prearranged trading plan filed last summer, came as Mr. Musk, the company’s chief executive, took a time-consuming role in the Trump administration. Tesla’s car sales have plunged partly because Mr. Musk’s political activities have turned off some car buyers. The company’s quarterly profit fell in the first three months of 2025 to its lowest level in four years.
Ms. Denholm earned the right to buy those shares, known as stock options, for serving on the board, a part-time position. Tesla granted the options between 2014 and 2020, and its share price has soared since then, giving Ms. Denholm the right to buy shares for a lot less than their current price. Last week, for example, she bought more than 112,000 shares for $24.73 apiece and sold them the same day for more than $270.
Stock Sales Aligned With Surging Share Prices
Robyn Denholm filed a stock sale plan soon after Elon Musk endorsed Donald Trump for president. The first sale came the week after Mr. Trump was elected.
“To dump her stock, it doesn’t send a message that this is a board chair who is invested in the future of the company,” said the New York City comptroller, Brad Lander, who oversees the city’s five public pension funds. As of March, those funds held more than three million Tesla shares, valued at the time at roughly $817 million.
A spokesman for Ms. Denholm said Tesla paid board members in a manner that was “completely aligned with shareholder interests.”
“The reason the value of the Tesla directors’ options has increased is because Tesla has outperformed its industry peers and created outsized returns for the owners of the company, the shareholders,” he said in a statement.
Stock options, which for years made up the bulk of Tesla directors’ compensation, are valuable only if the company’s share price rises, as Tesla’s did. Those who exercise their options to buy company stock can sell or hold on to their new shares.
Ms. Denholm has sold more than 1.4 million Tesla shares and continues to hold 85,000 of them and roughly 49,000 stock options, according to the Times analysis. Equilar, a compensation research firm, reviewed the methodology. Her latest wave of stock sales were carried out under the plan she set into motion in July, soon after Mr. Musk endorsed Donald J. Trump for president.
Under securities regulations, executives and other insiders can use such plans to trade shares in their companies. They are not required to disclose many details of their plans, including the reason for them or the conditions under which shares will be sold. They also have a lot of leeway to cancel the plans.
A native of Australia and veteran technology executive, Ms. Denholm has maintained a low profile and rarely speaks publicly about Tesla or Mr. Musk. She was recruited to the Tesla board in 2014 and appointed chair in 2018 after Mr. Musk agreed to step down from the position under a settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
She and other board members have been criticized by some investors, activists and a Delaware judge for not serving as counterweights to Mr. Musk, who is widely seen as brash and impulsive. Tesla directors have also been faulted for failing to ensure that he remains focused on Tesla.
“Musk operates as if free of board oversight,” Chancellor Kathaleen St. J. McCormick of the Delaware Court of Chancery wrote last year when she ruled in favor of a shareholder who had challenged Mr. Musk’s 2018 pay package, valued at around $56 billion. Judge McCormick, in that ruling, described Ms. Denholm’s style of overseeing Mr. Musk as “lackadaisical.”
Tesla has appealed the decision, which voided Mr. Musk’s pay package, and Ms. Denholm has pushed back on Judge McCormick’s critique.
“Anybody who knows me, knows that I am not lackadaisical, now that I know what that word means,” Ms. Denholm told The Financial Times last year. “It is probably the furthest from the truth. I am really intense and very diligent in what I do.”
During the trial over Mr. Musk’s pay, Ms. Denholm described the money she had made from her Tesla board service as “life-changing.” Director pay at Tesla was subject to a separate lawsuit that Ms. Denholm and other board members settled in 2023.
Mr. Musk, who has long been a part-time chief executive of Tesla, has taken on even more responsibilities over the years. He has become a regular presence in Washington, leading President Trump’s efforts to slash government spending and dismiss federal government employees.
Mr. Musk said recently he would cut back his time in Washington to one or two days a week. His attention is likely to remain divided, however, because he also leads several other businesses, including SpaceX and X, the social media site he owns.
Ms. Denholm’s first sales under her recent trading plan took place in November, the week after the presidential election, as Tesla’s share price was climbing. The stock reached a new high a few weeks later, in December. She continued to sell through early May, as the company faced consumer backlash over Mr. Musk’s political activities and the stock price fell.
The stock is now down around 34 percent from its peak after recovering some of its losses over the last few weeks.
Mr. Musk acknowledged Tesla’s difficulties during a meeting with company employees in March. “If you read the news it feels like, you know, Armageddon,” he said half-jokingly.
He went on to advise workers not to sell their stock, saying Tesla would become the most valuable company in the world as it perfected self-driving taxis and robots that resembled and moved like humans. “The future is incredibly bright,” he said.
Ms. Denholm’s sales have far outstripped those by other Tesla directors, with the exception of Mr. Musk, who remained on the board after stepping down as chair.
She and other current and former Tesla board members agreed to settle a shareholder lawsuit over their pay in 2023, collectively agreeing to return compensation valued at $735 million. They denied wrongdoing. Stock options valued at more than $130 million were canceled on May 1 to satisfy Ms. Denholm’s obligations under that settlement, securities filings show.
Board members agreed in June 2021, after that lawsuit was filed, to forgo new equity grants.
Ms. Denholm also made more money selling her company’s stock than the leaders of other corporate boards during the same period. The Times reviewed stock sales by board chairs at the most valuable U.S. companies who, like Ms. Denholm, are not executives at those companies.
The nonexecutive chair with the next-highest profit from selling shares in the company he oversees was Stephen Hemsley of UnitedHealth Group. Mr. Hemsley has earned more than $100 million from the sale of UnitedHealth shares since November 2018, though he received all of that stock while he was chief executive of the health care company.
UnitedHealth Group confirmed the findings, but declined to comment. On Tuesday, the company announced that Mr. Hemsley would retake the chief executive job in addition to serving as chairman.
Share sales by executives and directors often predict poor performance by the companies they lead, some academic research has found.
Leaders like Ms. Denholm have access to nonpublic information and a deep understanding of how broader economic forces may affect company performance. That can make their trades especially profitable, according to Nejat Seyhun, a professor of finance at the University of Michigan.
Insiders “set up plans when they have information,” Professor Seyhun said. If conditions change, “they can cancel those plans.”
